Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 4, 2026

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy DISE with Target Controlled Infusion TCI and Bispectral Analysis in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Published on: December 6, 2016
Weighted STOP-Bang and screening for sleep-disordered breathing
Ryan Nahapetian1, Graciela E Silva2, Kimberly D Vana3
1Arizona Respiratory Center and Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy, and Sleep Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 North Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ, 85724, USA. rnahapetian@deptofmed.arizona.edu.
Modifying the STOP-Bang score by using continuous variables for BMI, age, and neck circumference improved its ability to predict sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) by increasing specificity and likelihood ratios.
Area of Science:
- Sleep Medicine
- Respiratory Medicine
- Diagnostic Tool Development
Background:
- The STOP-Bang tool is used to assess the risk of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB).
- Conventional STOP-Bang scoring uses dichotomous variables.
- There is a need to improve the diagnostic characteristics of the STOP-Bang tool.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate if modifying the STOP-Bang tool by weighting variables can enhance its predictive performance for SDB.
- To compare the test characteristics of a modified STOP-Bang score with the conventional score.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the Sleep Heart Health Study (SHHS) with derivation (n=1667) and validation (n=4774) datasets.
- Linear regression was used to determine coefficients for variable weighting.
- Continuous variables (BMI, age, neck circumference) were incorporated into modified scoring models: weighted STOP-Bang (wSTOP-Bang) and continuous STOP-Bang (cSTOP-Bang).
- Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to assess performance.
Main Results:
- The continuous STOP-Bang (cSTOP-Bang) model demonstrated a higher area under the curve (AUC) of 0.738 compared to conventional STOP-Bang (0.706) and weighted STOP-Bang (0.69).
- Sensitivities were similar across all models (approximately 93.2%).
- cSTOP-Bang exhibited significantly higher specificity (31.8%) than conventional STOP-Bang (23.2%) and wSTOP-Bang (23.6%).
- cSTOP-Bang also showed a higher positive likelihood ratio (1.36) compared to the other models.
Conclusions:
- Weighting STOP-Bang variables and utilizing continuous data for BMI, age, and neck circumference improves diagnostic accuracy for SDB.
- The modified continuous STOP-Bang score maintains high sensitivity while enhancing specificity and positive likelihood ratio.
- This refined scoring method offers improved predictive value for sleep-disordered breathing.
Related Concept Videos
Sleep Apnea
The condition is more prevalent among...
Substance Use Disorders Affecting Sleep
Understanding the concepts of physical dependence,...
Sleepwalking and Sleep Talking
Factors that increase the likelihood of sleepwalking include sleep deprivation and alcohol consumption. Contrary to common beliefs, it is safe...
Assessment of Airway, Skin Color, and Use of Accessory Muscles
Introduction
The initial evaluation of a patient's respiratory system...

