Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

13:19
Microarray-based Identification of Individual HERV Loci Expression: Application to Biomarker Discovery in Prostate Cancer
Published on: November 2, 2013
17.3K
Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Based Population Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Evidence-Based Analysis.
Ontario Health Technology Assessment Series
|September 15, 2015
Summary
Prostate cancer (PC) screening using prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests does not significantly reduce PC mortality. Evidence suggests PSA screening may increase detection of low-risk cancers without improving overall survival.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Public Health
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Prostate cancer (PC) is a leading cancer diagnosis in men, with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing widely used for over two decades.
- The effectiveness of population-based PSA screening programs for PC remains a critical public health question, particularly for healthcare policy decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the scientific literature to determine the effectiveness of PSA-based population screening programs for PC.
- To provide evidence to inform policy decisions regarding PSA screening within publicly funded healthcare systems.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of bibliographic databases was conducted, focusing on systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of PSA-based PC screening.
- The search strategy aimed to identify studies reporting on PC mortality and all-cause mortality as key outcomes.
Main Results:
- The review identified 5 systematic reviews and 6 RCTs. No systematic reviews found a statistically significant reduction in PC or overall mortality with PSA screening.
- While one RCT (European) showed a statistically significant reduction in PC mortality, the absolute benefit was small, and treatment protocols varied.
- Another RCT (American PLCO) found no significant reduction, and potentially a non-significant increase, in PC mortality, with high opportunistic screening in the control group. All RCTs noted an increase in detection of low-risk PCs and no reduction in all-cause mortality.
Conclusions:
- The American PLCO trial, conducted in a setting with prevalent opportunistic screening, showed no evidence of reduced PC mortality.
- Given similar opportunistic PSA screening practices in Canada, a formal screening program is unlikely to decrease PC mortality.
- The findings suggest that widespread PSA screening may lead to overdiagnosis of low-risk prostate cancers without a clear mortality benefit.

