Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026

A Multicenter MRI Protocol for the Evaluation and Quantification of Deep Vein Thrombosis
Published on: June 2, 2015
Lupus anticoagulant: a multicenter study for a standardized and harmonized reporting.
Alessandra Poz1, Paola Pradella, Gabriella Azzarini
1aDepartment of Medical and Biological Sciences, University of Udine bDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, AOUD 'S. Maria della Misericordia', University Hospital, Udine cHaemostasis Laboratory, Department of Transfusion Medicine, AOUTS 'Ospedali Riuniti', University Hospital of Cattinara, Trieste dLaboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Pathology, Azienda ULSS 12 Veneziana, General Hospital ' Dell'Angelo', Venezia Mestre eCentre for inherited or acquired haemorragic and thrombotic diseases, Department of Transfusion Medicine, AOSMA, General Hospital 'S. Maria degli Angeli', Pordenone fLaboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Pathology, Azienda ULSS 9, General Hospital 'Ca' Foncello', Treviso gLaboratory Medicine, Department of Clinical Pathology, Azienda ULSS 8, General Hospital 'San Giacomo', Via dei Carpani 16, Castelfranco Veneto, Italy.
Standardizing Lupus anticoagulant (LAC) testing is crucial due to lab variability. This study proposes a scoring system using dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and silica clotting time (SCT) assays for clearer LAC interpretation.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Clinical Chemistry
- Immunology
Background:
- Laboratory assessment of Lupus anticoagulant (LAC) faces significant challenges due to inter- and intra-laboratory variability.
- This variability hinders standardization and harmonization of LAC test results expression.
- Accurate LAC detection is critical for diagnosing thrombotic disorders.
Purpose of the Study:
- To address the challenges in LAC laboratory assessment by proposing a standardized approach.
- To establish reliable positivity cutoffs and interpretative criteria for LAC assays.
- To improve the objectivity and clarity of LAC reporting through a collaborative study.
Main Methods:
- A cross-laboratory study involving five hospital laboratories in North-eastern Italy.
- Analysis of 100 normal samples to determine negative upper limits and positivity cutoffs for dRVVT and SCT assays.
- Evaluation of 311 previously diagnosed LAC-positive samples to characterize positivity levels.
Main Results:
- Negative upper limits were established at 1.17 for dRVVT screen ratio and 1.19 for SCT screen ratio.
- Positivity cutoffs were set at 1.20 for dRVVT and 1.23 for SCT (Test Ratio).
- A proposed scoring system categorized positive LAC results into weak, moderate, and strong levels.
Conclusions:
- The combined use of dRVVT and SCT assays, with defined positivity levels, enhances LAC reporting objectivity.
- An interpretative table for a proposed LAC score aids in clearer interpretation of positive results.
- All participating centers have adopted the proposed interpretative table for LAC reporting.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation

