Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding Practitioner Comfort and Educational Priorities for Safe Opioid Prescribing: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study.

Journal of pain research·2026
Same author

Germline regulation of tumor evolutionary dynamics shapes multiple myeloma progression.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

ceQTL: a co-expression QTL model to detect a variant that affects transcription factor binding and its target regulation.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

STAT1 and STAT3 signaling in ovarian cancer: prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

BMC cancer·2026
Same author

A complete human pancreatic cancer genome.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Haplotype-resolved genome assemblies of BJ and IMR-90 human fibroblast cell lines reveal extensive structural variation and enable reanalysis of historical sequencing data.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same journal

HOTAIR at the metabolic crossroads: lncRNA control of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism.

Epigenomics·2026
Same journal

Long-term molecular embedding of early life adversity: leukocyte DNA methylation and gene expression associations from childhood to young adulthood.

Epigenomics·2026
Same journal

Overview of transcriptomics and epigenomics approaches in the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutics of primary brain cancers.

Epigenomics·2026
Same journal

Ultra-sensitive urine DNA methylation test enables early and accurate detection of bladder cancer.

Epigenomics·2026
Same journal

Promoter methylation-associated brain-enriched long noncoding RNAs in glioblastoma: a multi-cohort public epigenomic re-analysis.

Epigenomics·2026
Same journal

Clinical diagnostic utility of <i>MGMT</i> promoter methylation.

Epigenomics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution
13:47

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution

Published on: February 24, 2015

26.6K

Base resolution methylome profiling: considerations in platform selection, data preprocessing and analysis.

Zhifu Sun1, Julie Cunningham2, Susan Slager1

  • 1Division of Biomedical Statistics & Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Epigenomics
|September 15, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review compares DNA methylome profiling platforms, including microarrays and sequencing, to guide researchers in choosing methods and analysis strategies for differential methylation studies. It addresses common confusions regarding data normalization and statistical model selection for accurate results.

Keywords:
DNA methylationbisulfite sequencingdifferential methylationmethylation 450K arraynormalizationreduced representation bisulfite sequencingstudy design

More Related Videos

A Rat Methyl-Seq Platform to Identify Epigenetic Changes Associated with Stress Exposure
09:06

A Rat Methyl-Seq Platform to Identify Epigenetic Changes Associated with Stress Exposure

Published on: October 24, 2018

11.4K
Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies
14:56

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies

Published on: May 6, 2022

5.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution
13:47

Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing for Assessment of DNA Methylation at Base Pair Resolution

Published on: February 24, 2015

26.6K
A Rat Methyl-Seq Platform to Identify Epigenetic Changes Associated with Stress Exposure
09:06

A Rat Methyl-Seq Platform to Identify Epigenetic Changes Associated with Stress Exposure

Published on: October 24, 2018

11.4K
Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies
14:56

Sample Preparation to Bioinformatics Analysis of DNA Methylation: Association Strategy for Obesity and Related Trait Studies

Published on: May 6, 2022

5.3K

Area of Science:

  • Epigenetics and Genomics
  • Bioinformatics and Computational Biology

Background:

  • DNA methylation is crucial for gene regulation and cellular function.
  • Base-resolution methylome research commonly employs bisulfite treatment-based microarray (Illumina 450K) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms.
  • Existing data preprocessing and analysis tools present challenges regarding normalization, platform selection, and statistical modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a comprehensive review of commonly used DNA methylome profiling platforms.
  • To compare the advantages and disadvantages of different platforms for methylome research.
  • To clarify confusions surrounding data normalization, bias correction, and statistical model selection for differential methylation analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established DNA methylome profiling technologies, including Illumina 450K arrays and various bisulfite sequencing methods (RRBS, SureSelect, SeqCap Epi, WGBS).
  • Comparative analysis of platform performance, cost, and data output.
  • Discussion of best practices for study design, data preprocessing, normalization, bias correction, and statistical analysis.

Main Results:

  • Detailed comparison of Illumina 450K arrays and NGS-based bisulfite sequencing platforms, highlighting their respective strengths and limitations.
  • Identification of key considerations for selecting an appropriate methylome profiling platform based on research objectives.
  • Outline of approaches for robust data normalization, bias correction, and statistical modeling for differential methylation analysis.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of methylome profiling platform significantly impacts research outcomes and requires careful consideration of experimental goals.
  • Standardized approaches to data normalization and statistical analysis are essential for reliable identification of differentially methylated CpGs and regions.
  • This review offers guidance to researchers navigating the complexities of methylome profiling and analysis, promoting more informed decision-making.