Bypass surgery versus endovascular interventions in severe or critical limb ischemia
Abd Moain Abu Dabrh1, Mark W Steffen2, Noor Asi3
1Division of Preventive, Occupational, and Aerospace Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn; Knowledge Synthesis Unit, the Center for Healthcare Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
Insights
Bypass surgery and endovascular revascularization show similar outcomes for critical limb ischemia mortality and amputation. However, bypass surgery offers better patency rates, despite low-quality evidence for mortality and amputation.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Interventional Cardiology
- Evidence-Based Medicine
Background:
- Critical limb ischemia (CLI) presents significant morbidity and mortality risks.
- Revascularization is crucial for limb salvage in CLI patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and compare bypass surgery versus endovascular revascularization for CLI.
- To evaluate key outcomes including mortality, amputation, patency, and wound healing.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of multiple databases (MEDLINE, Embase, etc.) up to October 2014.
- Inclusion of randomized and non-randomized comparative studies.
- Meta-analysis using random-effects models to pool odds ratios.
Main Results:
- Nine studies with 3071 patients were analyzed.
- No significant differences in mortality (OR 0.72) or amputation (OR 1.2) were found.
- Bypass surgery demonstrated superior primary (OR 2.50) and assisted primary patency (OR 3.39).
Conclusions:
- Evidence quality for mortality and amputation is low, suggesting similar outcomes between approaches.
- Bypass surgery offers improved patency, a key factor in long-term limb salvage.
- Further high-quality research is needed to confirm these findings.
Objective:
Critical limb ischemia is associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. We systematically reviewed the evidence to compare bypass surgery with endovascular revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia.
Methods:
We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, and Scopus through October 2014 for comparative studies (randomized and nonrandomized). Predefined outcomes of interest were mortality, major amputation, patency, and wound healing. We pooled odds ratios (ORs) of the outcomes of interest using the random-effects model.
Results:
Nine studies that enrolled 3071 subjects were included. There was no significant difference in mortality (OR, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.44-1.16) or amputation (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.87-1.65). Bypass surgery was associated with higher primary patency (OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.25-4.99) and assisted primary patency (OR, 3.39; 95% CI, 1.53-7.51). The quality of evidence was low for mortality and amputation outcomes and moderate for patency outcomes.
Conclusions:
Low quality of evidence due to imprecision and heterogeneity suggests that bypass surgery and endovascular approaches may have similar effect on mortality and major amputations. However, better primary and primary assisted patency can be expected with surgery.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management

