Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

23.5K
Overview
23.5K
Genetics of Speciation02:16

Genetics of Speciation

23.3K
Speciation is the evolutionary process resulting in the formation of new, distinct species—groups of reproductively isolated populations.
23.3K
Formation of Species01:31

Formation of Species

46.8K
Speciation describes the formation of one or more new species from one or sometimes multiple original species. The resulting species are discrete from the parent species, and barriers to reproduction will typically exist. There are two primary mechanisms, speciation with and without geographic isolation—allopatric and sympatric speciation, respectively.
46.8K
Inclusive Fitness00:57

Inclusive Fitness

44.0K
Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.
44.0K
Genetic Drift03:33

Genetic Drift

45.2K
Natural selection—probably the most well-known evolutionary mechanism—increases the prevalence of traits that enhance survival and reproduction. However, evolution does not merely propagate favorable traits, nor does it always benefit populations.
45.2K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

36.0K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
36.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Behavior and Physiology Outpace Form When Linking Traits to Ecological Responses within Populations: A Meta-Analysis.

The American naturalist·2026
Same author

eDNA Provides Accurate Population Abundance Estimates With Bioenergetics and Particle Mass-Balance Modelling.

Molecular ecology·2026
Same author

Evolution of Threespine Stickleback (<i>Gasterosteus aculeatus</i>) Defensive Traits following the Stocking of Brook Trout (<i>Salvelinus fontinalis</i>).

The American naturalist·2026
Same author

Genome size and phenotypic change: insights on contemporary evolution across biological groups.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2026
Same author

Contemporary Evolution of an At-Risk Stickleback Population During a Severe Drought.

Evolutionary applications·2026
Same author

Lake size shapes the relationship between body mass and gut microbiota in threespine stickleback ( <i>Gasterosteus aculeatus</i> ).

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

4.6K

Speciation without Pre-Defined Fitness Functions.

Robin Gras1, Abbas Golestani2, Andrew P Hendry3

  • 1School of Computer Science, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada; Department of Biology, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, Canada; Great Lakes Institute for Environmental Research, Windsor, ON, Canada.

Plos One
|September 16, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Natural selection drives speciation by promoting distinct clusters, even without pre-defined fitness functions. This emergent property of evolving ecological interactions is key to understanding species formation.

More Related Videos

Determination of the Mating Efficiency of Haploids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
05:39

Determination of the Mating Efficiency of Haploids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: December 2, 2022

3.4K
A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing
11:36

A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing

Published on: July 3, 2016

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
15:00

Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli

Published on: August 18, 2023

4.6K
Determination of the Mating Efficiency of Haploids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
05:39

Determination of the Mating Efficiency of Haploids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: December 2, 2022

3.4K
A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing
11:36

A Protocol for Functional Assessment of Whole-Protein Saturation Mutagenesis Libraries Utilizing High-Throughput Sequencing

Published on: July 3, 2016

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Theoretical Ecology
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Speciation is difficult to study in real organisms, leading to reliance on theoretical models.
  • Existing models often use pre-defined fitness functions, leaving speciation without these determinants unexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate speciation mechanisms in the absence of pre-defined fitness functions.
  • To explore how evolving ecological interactions and natural selection contribute to divergence.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the individual-based ecosystem simulation platform EcoSim.
  • Simulated an environment with evolving behavioral models for resource and predator-prey interactions.
  • Compared simulations with and without natural selection and spatial isolation.

Main Results:

  • Simulations with natural selection generated distinct phenotypic/genotypic clusters with low hybridization.
  • Emergent divergence in spatially-localized behavioral models drove speciation.
  • Simulations lacking natural selection produced weaker, overlapping clusters or no clusters.

Conclusions:

  • Natural selection plays a crucial role in speciation, even without explicit fitness functions.
  • Evolving ecological interactions can lead to emergent speciation.
  • Spatial isolation and natural selection are important, but natural selection is the primary driver in this model.