Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Compartment Models: Two-Compartment Model01:20

Compartment Models: Two-Compartment Model

7.7K
The two-compartment model divides the body into central and peripheral compartments to account for varying blood perfusion rates among organs and tissues, affecting drug distribution. The central compartment includes blood and highly perfused tissues with rapid drug distribution, while the peripheral compartment contains tissues with slower drug distribution. After a single IV bolus dose, the drug concentration is high in plasma and low in tissues. The drug distribution between compartments...
7.7K
Compartment Models: Single-Compartment Model01:14

Compartment Models: Single-Compartment Model

3.6K
The single-compartment model serves as a simplified representation of the human body. This model assumes that the body functions as a single, well-mixed open compartment. When a drug is administered intravenously, it enters the body and quickly distributes uniformly. The drug then undergoes biotransformation and elimination, ultimately leaving the body. The volume of this compartment is referred to as the apparent volume of distribution into which the drug can uniformly distribute. In this...
3.6K
Two-Compartment Open Model: Overview01:05

Two-Compartment Open Model: Overview

712
Multicompartmental models are crucial tools in pharmacokinetics, providing a framework to understand how drugs move within the body. The two-compartment model is a crucial subtype, segmenting the body into central and peripheral compartments. The central compartment represents areas with high blood flow, such as plasma and highly perfused organs like the kidneys and liver, while the peripheral compartment signifies tissues with lower blood flow, like adipose tissue and muscle tissue.
The...
712
Two-Compartment Open Model: IV Infusion01:15

Two-Compartment Open Model: IV Infusion

735
A two-compartment model is a vital tool in pharmacokinetics, providing an essential understanding of drug behavior, especially for those administered via zero-order intravenous infusion. This model outlines two compartments: the central compartment, where elimination occurs, and the peripheral compartment.
The model illustrates the decrease in plasma drug concentration from the central compartment with a specific equation. It shows that under steady-state conditions, the drug's input rate...
735
Two-Compartment Open Model: Extravascular Administration01:12

Two-Compartment Open Model: Extravascular Administration

822
The two-compartment model for extravascular administration represents a drug's absorption and distribution process. It features a central compartment, where the drug is first absorbed, and a peripheral compartment, which illustrates the drug's distribution throughout the body. The rate of change in drug concentration in the central compartment is calculated by three exponents: absorption, distribution, and elimination.
The absorption exponent (ka) indicates the speed at which the drug...
822
Three-Compartment Open Model01:06

Three-Compartment Open Model

1.1K
The three-compartment open model is a pharmacokinetic model used to describe the distribution and elimination of drugs following extravascular administration. It comprises a central compartment representing the plasma and two peripheral compartments. The highly perfused peripheral compartment represents organs and tissues with a rich blood supply, such as the liver, kidneys, and lungs. The scarcely perfused peripheral compartment represents tissues with lower blood supply, such as adipose...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A deep learning algorithm for automatic 3D segmentation and classification of the sheep placenta in magnetic resonance images.

Physiological reports·2026
Same author

A Virtual Trial to Identify Cardiovascular Biomarkers for Differentiating Diabetic and Hypertensive Kidney Disease.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

A longitudinal MRI dataset of brain metastases with tumor segmentations, clinical & radiomic data.

Scientific data·2025
Same author

Feasibility of multimodal magnetic resonance imaging to assess maternal hyperoxygenation in sheep pregnancy.

The Journal of physiology·2025
Same author

An In Silico Modelling Approach to Predict Hemodynamic Outcomes in Diabetic and Hypertensive Kidney Disease.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2024
Same author

Identifiability of spatiotemporal tissue perfusion models.

Physics in medicine and biology·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Diffusion Imaging in the Rat Cervical Spinal Cord
10:46

Diffusion Imaging in the Rat Cervical Spinal Cord

Published on: April 7, 2015

12.3K

Fitting the two-compartment model in DCE-MRI by linear inversion.

Dimitra Flouri1,2, Daniel Lesnic2, Steven P Sourbron1

  • 1Division of Biomedical Imaging, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
|September 17, 2015
PubMed
Summary

A new linear least squares (LLS) method significantly speeds up dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) analysis. This LLS approach offers faster and more reliable fitting of DCE-MRI models, especially in low-noise conditions.

Keywords:
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaginglinear least squaresnon-linear least-squarestracer-kineticstwo-compartment model

More Related Videos

Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging
17:06

Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging

Published on: November 8, 2012

27.2K
Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging
11:28

Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging

Published on: June 30, 2018

12.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Diffusion Imaging in the Rat Cervical Spinal Cord
10:46

Diffusion Imaging in the Rat Cervical Spinal Cord

Published on: April 7, 2015

12.3K
Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging
17:06

Co-analysis of Brain Structure and Function using fMRI and Diffusion-weighted Imaging

Published on: November 8, 2012

27.2K
Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging
11:28

Concurrent EEG and Functional MRI Recording and Integration Analysis for Dynamic Cortical Activity Imaging

Published on: June 30, 2018

12.4K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biophysics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is crucial for analyzing tissue perfusion and vascularity.
  • Current nonlinear least squares (NLLS) fitting methods for DCE-MRI models are computationally intensive and sensitive to initial parameter values.
  • This limits the speed and reliability of DCE-MRI data analysis in clinical and research settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a linear least squares (LLS) method for fitting two-compartment exchange and -filtration models in DCE-MRI.
  • To compare the performance, speed, accuracy, and precision of the proposed LLS method against traditional NLLS methods.

Main Methods:

  • Derived a second-order linear differential equation where model parameters serve as coefficients.
  • Simulated DCE-MRI data (normal and pathological) with varying noise levels and temporal resolutions.
  • Evaluated LLS performance against NLLS through calculation time, accuracy, and precision metrics.

Main Results:

  • The LLS method demonstrated a ~200-fold increase in speed, reducing analysis time for an MR slice from 9 minutes to 3 seconds.
  • LLS and NLLS showed comparable accuracy and precision with ideal, low-noise, high-temporal-resolution data.
  • LLS outperformed NLLS in accuracy and precision at low temporal resolution but was less accurate at high noise levels.

Conclusions:

  • The LLS method offers substantial reductions in DCE-MRI data processing time.
  • LLS provides more reliable results under low-noise conditions, making it a valuable alternative to NLLS.
  • Further optimization, potentially through weighting strategies, may improve LLS accuracy in high-noise scenarios.