Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Neural Circuits01:25

Neural Circuits

3.3K
Neural circuits and neuronal pools are two of the main structures found in the nervous system. Neural circuits are networks of neurons that work together to carry out a specific task or process. They consist of interconnected neurons and glial cells, which provide structural and metabolic support.
Neuronal pools are collections of nerve cells with similar functions and interact through chemical and electrical signals. These pools include both interneurons (the central neural circuit nodes that...
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

<b>A new species and a new record of the genus <i>Bucculatrix</i> Zeller, 1839 (Lepidoptera: Bucculatricidae) from Korea</b>.

Zootaxa·2026
Same author

Correction: Quantifying harmony between direct and indirect pathways in the basal ganglia: healthy and Parkinsonian states.

Cognitive neurodynamics·2025
Same author

Recombinant ADAMTS‑1 promotes muscle regeneration accompanied by downregulation of Notch signaling.

International journal of molecular medicine·2025
Same author

Lycium Radicis Cortex and Its Kukoamine Constituents Attenuate Sarcopenia by Modulating Anabolic and Catabolic Pathways.

Biomolecules & therapeutics·2025
Same author

<i>Terminalia chebula</i> Fruit Extract Ameliorates Peripheral Edema by Inhibiting NF-κB and MAPK Signaling Pathways.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025
Same author

Three new species of the genus Argyresthia Hbner, [1825] (Lepidoptera: Argyresthiidae) from Korea.

Zootaxa·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Optogenetic Entrainment of Hippocampal Theta Oscillations in Behaving Mice
07:33

Optogenetic Entrainment of Hippocampal Theta Oscillations in Behaving Mice

Published on: June 29, 2018

12.4K

Fast sparsely synchronized brain rhythms in a scale-free neural network.

Sang-Yoon Kim1, Woochang Lim1

  • 1Institute for Computational Neuroscience and Department of Science Education, Daegu National University of Education, Daegu 705-115, Korea.

Physical Review. E, Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
|September 19, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how noise and network structure influence synchronized brain rhythms in inhibitory neuron networks. Sparse synchronization emerges with increased noise and specific network architectures, revealing neuronal dynamics and network inhomogeneity.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Advancing Large-Scale Neural Dynamics Through HD-MEA Technology
09:44

Author Spotlight: Advancing Large-Scale Neural Dynamics Through HD-MEA Technology

Published on: March 8, 2024

6.2K
How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

7.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Optogenetic Entrainment of Hippocampal Theta Oscillations in Behaving Mice
07:33

Optogenetic Entrainment of Hippocampal Theta Oscillations in Behaving Mice

Published on: June 29, 2018

12.4K
Author Spotlight: Advancing Large-Scale Neural Dynamics Through HD-MEA Technology
09:44

Author Spotlight: Advancing Large-Scale Neural Dynamics Through HD-MEA Technology

Published on: March 8, 2024

6.2K
How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study
05:33

How to Calculate and Validate Inter-brain Synchronization in a fNIRS Hyperscanning Study

Published on: September 8, 2021

7.7K

Area of Science:

  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Network Science
  • Systems Neuroscience

Background:

  • Neuronal synchronization is crucial for brain function, but its emergence in complex networks remains an active research area.
  • Scale-free networks, like those modeled by Barabási-Albert, exhibit unique topological properties relevant to biological systems.
  • Understanding how noise and network structure interact to shape neuronal population dynamics is essential for deciphering brain activity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the emergence of sparsely synchronized rhythms in a directed Barabási-Albert scale-free network of Izhikevich interneurons.
  • To analyze the impact of synaptic inhibition strength (J) and noise intensity (D) on neuronal synchronization patterns.
  • To explore how network architecture variations affect sparse synchronization and individual neuronal contributions.

Main Methods:

  • Simulated a directed Barabási-Albert scale-free network with symmetric preferential attachment.
  • Utilized the Izhikevich model for fast-spiking inhibitory interneurons.
  • Varied synaptic inhibition strength (J) and noise intensity (D) to observe population states and synchronization phenomena.
  • Employed an order parameter to identify the critical noise level (D*) for transitions in synchronization.
  • Applied statistical-mechanical measures to quantify population synchronization.

Main Results:

  • Sparsely synchronized rhythms with intermittent neuronal discharges appear at high synaptic inhibition (J) and noise intensity (D).
  • At low noise (D), full synchronization occurs; at high noise (D), partial and sparse synchronization (fp > 4〈fi〉) emerge, with neuronal mean firing rates (MFRs) varying by degree.
  • A critical noise level (D*) triggers a transition to unsynchronization, highlighting noise's disruptive role.
  • Partial and sparse synchronization reveal inhomogeneous network structures, contrasting with homogeneous random or small-world networks.
  • Network architecture variations (attachment degree, asymmetry) influence sparse synchronization and individual neuron contributions.

Conclusions:

  • Noise intensity and synaptic inhibition strength are critical factors in driving sparse synchronization in inhibitory neuronal networks.
  • The emergence of partial and sparse synchronization in scale-free networks is linked to network inhomogeneity and individual neuronal dynamics.
  • Network topology significantly modulates the relationship between neuronal activity and synchronization, offering insights into brain network organization.