Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026
Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
Comparison of ProTaper Next and HyFlex instruments on apical debris extrusion in curved canals
M M Koçak1, E Çiçek2, S Koçak1
1Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey.
Aim:
To evaluate the amount of apically extruded debris after root canal instrumentation with ProTaper Next and HyFlex instruments in curved root canals.
Methodology:
Forty extracted mandibular first molar teeth with curved mesial roots and of similar lengths were instrumented using ProTaper Next or HyFlex instruments. The extruded debris was collected into pre-weighed Eppendorf tubes. The tubes were stored in an incubator at 68 °C for 5 days. The tubes were weighed to obtain the final dry weight of the extruded debris. The weight of the extruded debris was determined by subtracting the initial weight from the final weight. Distribution of data was determined by Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous variables were compared with the Independent Sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. The significance level was set at P = 0.05.
Results:
Both instruments were associated with apical debris extrusion. The HyFlex group had significantly less debris extrusion than the ProTaper Next group (P = 0.014).
Conclusion:
HyFlex CM was associated with significantly less apical extrusion than ProTaper Next.
