Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
Nanocrystals of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 and the size-dependent spin-crossover characteristics
J Laisney1, A Tissot, G Molnár
1ICMMO-ECI, UMR CNRS 8182, Univ. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, 91405 Orsay, France. marie-laure.boillot@u-psud.fr.
Abstract:
We report on the size reduction of the neutral Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 prototypical compound exhibiting a cooperative spin-crossover associated with a first-order phase transition (at ca. 176 K). We use the [Fe(phen)3](NCS)2 ionic precursor and the solvent-assisted precipitation technique to prepare an array of crystalline objects with sizes varying over two orders of magnitude (from 15 up to 1400 nm). TEM, X-ray diffraction and IR measurements provide evidences for the formation of particles of neutral and ionic species, which results from the interplay between the relevant chemical equilibrium and the reaction kinetics (ligand extraction, complex precipitation), and the modulation of the latter by physico-chemical parameters. A thermal transformation of diamagnetic nanocrystals of [Fe(phen)3](NCS)2 leads to spin-crossover particles of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 of a comparable size. Powders of nano-, micro- and polycrystals of Fe(phen)2(NCS)2 present X-ray diffractograms typical of the so-called polymorph II. The importance of size effects on the cooperative spin-crossover process was probed with magnetic, Mössbauer, Raman and IR spectroscopic measurements. Each sample exhibits spin-state switching of the Fe(ii) ions. The salient features are: a cooperativity preserved at the micrometric scale, a very limited downshift of the transition temperature and an asymmetric spreading of the thermal process (over ca. 100 K) with the size reduction. At temperatures close to room temperature, the process appears to be quasi complete whatever the size of the samples. This result, extracted from Raman data, was confirmed by Mössbauer measurements in the case of the largest objects (LS residue <5-10% for bulk and microparticles). Below 150 K, a very efficient low-spin to high-spin photoexcitation was induced by the Raman laser beam in all the samples which prevents the extraction of the high-spin fraction in this temperature range. However variable temperature IR spectra of the 29 nm particles indicate that the HS residue, that is close to zero in the case of microparticles, does not drastically increase (<30%) for the smallest particles. The processing of a number of related spin-crossover compounds in the form of nanoparticles may be achieved with this general approach.
More Related Videos
08:44Measurements of Long-range Electronic Correlations During Femtosecond Diffraction Experiments Performed on Nanocrystals of Buckminsterfullerene
Published on: August 22, 2017
06:54Characterization of Nanocrystal Size Distribution using Raman Spectroscopy with a Multi-particle Phonon Confinement Model
Published on: August 22, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Colors and Magnetism
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human...
Valence Bond Theory
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...