Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Comprehensive Spatial Profiling of Species-agnostic Transcriptomes via Stereo-seq
Published on: October 31, 2025
Multi-platform assessment of transcriptional profiling technologies utilizing a precise probe mapping methodology.
Jinsheng Yu1, Paul F Cliften1, Twyla I Juehne1
1Genome Technology Access Center, Department of Genetics, Washington University in Saint Louis School of Medicine, 660 S. Euclid Ave. Campus Box 8232, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) and microarray technologies show core similarities, with RNA-seq generally outperforming microarrays. However, specific microarray platforms demonstrate comparable performance, especially in fold-change accuracy, and achieve high concordance with qRT-PCR.
Area of Science:
- Genomics and transcriptomics
- High-throughput sequencing technologies
- Gene expression analysis
Background:
- RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) offers a high-throughput alternative to microarray technologies, necessitating comparative performance evaluations.
- Previous cross-platform comparisons were limited in scope and often focused solely on gene annotation.
- A comprehensive assessment is required to understand the nuances of RNA-seq and microarray performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct an extensive and precise comparative assessment of RNA-seq and microarray platforms.
- To elucidate differences and similarities in dynamic range, signal fidelity, fold-change accuracy, and qRT-PCR concordance.
- To introduce and validate the 'transcript pattern' concept for robust multi-platform comparisons.
Main Methods:
- Evaluation of six different gene expression platforms, including RNA-seq and microarray technologies.
- Analysis of data at three levels: entire datasets, common RefSeq genes, and transcript pattern-defined subsets.
- Assessment of dynamic range, signal fidelity, fold-change with sample titration, and concordance with quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) using TaqMan assays.
Main Results:
- Substantial core similarities were observed across all six platforms.
- Two RNA-seq protocols generally outperformed three of four microarray platforms in most assessed categories.
- A modified Agilent microarray protocol demonstrated comparable or superior performance to RNA-seq, particularly in fold-change evaluation, with over 80% concordance with qRT-PCR.
Conclusions:
- Microarray technology can achieve performance comparable to RNA-seq in key features, contingent on similar dynamic ranges.
- The introduced 'transcript pattern' method offers a strategy to mitigate confounding factors in multi-platform comparisons.
- This study provides valuable insights for selecting appropriate gene expression profiling technologies.
More Related Videos
09:19Spatial Profiling of Protein and RNA Expression in Tissue: An Approach to Fine-Tune Virtual Microdissection
Published on: July 6, 2022
12:54Real-time Analysis of Transcription Factor Binding, Transcription, Translation, and Turnover to Display Global Events During Cellular Activation
Published on: March 7, 2018
Related Concept Videos
DNA Microarrays
Ribosome Profiling
Applications of ribosome profiling
Ribosome profiling has many applications, including in vivo monitoring of translation inside a particular organ or tissue type and quantifying new protein synthesis levels.
The technique...