Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Catheter Ablation in Combination With Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 26, 2013
Bradycardia and atrial fibrillation in patients with stable coronary artery disease treated with ivabradine: an
Kim Fox1, Ian Ford2, Philippe Gabriel Steg3
1National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College, ICMS Royal Brompton Hospital, Guy Scadding Building, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY, UK kim.fox@imperial.ac.uk.
Bradycardia was common in patients treated with ivabradine for coronary artery disease (CAD), but did not impact cardiovascular outcomes. Emergent atrial fibrillation (AF) was rare and also did not affect outcomes compared to placebo.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
- Pharmacology
Background:
- The SIGNIFY trial (ISRCTN61576291) investigated the effects of ivabradine in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Emergent bradycardia and atrial fibrillation (AF) are potential side effects of heart rate-lowering medications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of emergent bradycardia and AF on cardiovascular outcomes in 19,083 patients with stable CAD receiving ivabradine or placebo.
- To determine if these emergent arrhythmias influence the efficacy of ivabradine in preventing cardiovascular events.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of data from the SIGNIFY trial, comparing outcomes in patients who developed bradycardia or AF on ivabradine versus placebo.
- Cardiovascular outcomes included cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction.
Main Results:
- Bradycardia (heart rate <50 bpm) occurred in 37.4% of ivabradine-treated patients but did not increase the risk of primary composite endpoint (cardiovascular death or non-fatal myocardial infarction).
- Emergent AF occurred at a higher rate with ivabradine (2.2% per year) versus placebo (1.5% per year), but did not lead to a significant difference in cardiovascular outcomes or stroke between treatment groups.
- No significant difference in treatment effect was observed in patients with limiting angina.
Conclusions:
- Emergent bradycardia is common with ivabradine in CAD patients but does not appear to adversely affect cardiovascular outcomes.
- Emergent AF is relatively rare and, despite a higher incidence with ivabradine, does not significantly impact outcomes compared to placebo.
Related Concept Videos
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class IV Agents as Calcium Channel Blockers
Verapamil, a calcium channel blocker, inhibits calcium movement across myocardial cell membranes and vascular smooth muscle. This results in the dilation of coronary and...
Dysrhythmias IV: Characteristics of Bradyarrhythmias
Decreased pulse rate
There are specific risk factors that can elevate the likelihood of developing bradycardia. Advanced age is a significant factor, with...
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Disturbances in Heart Rhythm
Arrhythmias are categorized by their speed, rhythm, and origin. A slow heart...
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class II Agents as β-Adrenergic Blockers

