Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026

09:29
Using Digital Image Correlation to Characterize Local Strains on Vascular Tissue Specimens
Published on: January 24, 2016
9.9K
Non-contact strain measurement in the mouse forearm loading model using digital image correlation (DIC)
Mark T Begonia1, Mark Dallas2, Bruno Vizcarra1
1University of Missouri-Kansas City, Department of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 350K Robert H. Flarsheim Hall, 5110 Rockhill Road, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.
Bone
|September 22, 2015
Summary
Digital Image Correlation (DIC) offers a superior, non-contact method for measuring mouse forearm strains compared to traditional strain gages. DIC captures complex strain heterogeneity, providing more accurate biomechanical data without artificially stiffening the bone.
Area of Science:
- Biomechanics
- Biomaterials Science
- Orthopedics
Background:
- Accurate strain measurement is crucial for understanding bone adaptation and fracture mechanics.
- Traditional strain gages can alter bone mechanics due to surface adhesion.
- Non-contact methods offer potential for more physiological strain assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate Digital Image Correlation (DIC) as a non-contact method for measuring mouse forearm strains during axial compression.
- To compare DIC measurements with traditional strain gage data.
- To investigate factors influencing DIC accuracy, including ROI, magnification, noise, and motion.
Main Methods:
- A two-camera DIC system was employed to capture medial and lateral forearm displacements.
- DIC strain data were compared against strain gage readings from the ulna and radius.
- Analysis included variations in region-of-interest (ROI) location, lens magnification, system noise, and out-of-plane motion.
- Finite element (FE) simulations were used to assess the impact of out-of-plane motion.
Main Results:
- DIC successfully differentiated strain levels between the ulna and radius, and between medial (compressive) and lateral (tensile) bone surfaces.
- DIC revealed surface strain heterogeneity not detectable by strain gages.
- System noise was minimal (<4.5% of measurements).
- Out-of-plane motion did not significantly influence DIC measurements.
- DIC measurements on medial bone surfaces were 1.5-2 times greater than strain gage readings.
Conclusions:
- Digital Image Correlation (DIC) provides a more accurate and comprehensive assessment of mouse forearm strains during loading compared to strain gages.
- DIC's non-contact nature prevents artificial stiffening of the bone, leading to a more realistic strain response.
- This advanced imaging technique enhances biomechanical studies of bone loading and adaptation.

