Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Healing cascades and infections in wounds monitored using a wearable sensor of gaseous flux.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Defending the Ethical Permissibility of Laryngeal Transplantation.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026
Same author

Simultaneous regeneration of skin and bone in full-thickness cranial composite defects.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Safety of Breast Neurotization Using Nerve Allografts in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Nationwide Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis.

Annals of plastic surgery·2026
Same author

Opioid Prescribing for Hand Surgery: A Medicare Part D Analysis.

Hand (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

Early Prediction of Scar Outcomes: A Prospective Study on the Predictive Value of 3-Month Scar Assessments for 12-Month Results.

International wound journal·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

392

Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects.

Chad M Teven1, Sean Fisher1, Guillermo A Ameer2

  • 1Department of Surgery, Section of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.

Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery
|September 22, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Tissue engineering offers promising solutions for craniofacial reconstruction when autologous bone is insufficient. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) combined with scaffolds and cells can optimize regenerative strategies for complex skeletal defects.

Keywords:
Biomimeticbone morphogenetic proteincraniofacial defect repairscaffold matrixthree-dimensional scaffold

More Related Videos

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography
02:42

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

941
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

8.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

392
Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography
02:42

Analysis of Craniomaxillofacial Malformations in Mice Using Three-dimensional Microcomputed Tomography

Published on: January 17, 2025

941
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
07:11

Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants

Published on: May 23, 2020

8.1K

Area of Science:

  • Regenerative Medicine
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Craniofacial Surgery

Background:

  • Craniofacial reconstruction aims to restore form, function, and aesthetics while respecting pediatric growth.
  • Autologous bone grafts are ideal but often limited by supply, necessitating alternative repair strategies.
  • Tissue engineering presents a promising avenue for addressing craniofacial defects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review recent advancements in tissue engineering for craniofacial defect repair.
  • To highlight the role of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) in bone regeneration.
  • To discuss the application of scaffold materials and novel cell lines in craniofacial reconstruction.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current literature on tissue engineering approaches for craniofacial bone repair.
  • Focus on growth factor-based strategies, particularly BMPs.
  • Investigation of cell-based and matrix-based models for enhanced bone regeneration.

Main Results:

  • BMPs show stimulatory effects on cranial bone and defect repair.
  • Combining BMPs with appropriate scaffolds and cell types optimizes regenerative outcomes.
  • Tissue engineering provides viable alternatives when autologous bone is unavailable.

Conclusions:

  • Tissue engineering, utilizing BMPs, scaffolds, and cells, offers effective strategies for craniofacial bone regeneration.
  • These methods can help surgeons achieve reconstructive goals for craniofacial defects.
  • Further research into novel cell lines and biomaterials will advance craniofacial repair.