Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Cluster Sampling Method

Cluster Sampling Method

Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Inferring and evaluating network medicine-based disease modules with nextflow.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026

Same author

Aberrant splicing in human cancer shows possible functional impact on transcription factors.

Oncogene·2026

Same author

An Integrated Skin Cell Atlas Decodes the Pilosebaceous Unit.

The Journal of investigative dermatology·2026

Same author

Phenotypic similarity of adverse drug reactions and disease phenotypes is a bridge to mechanistic discovery.

npj drug discovery·2026

Same author

Origin of sexual dimorphism in osteoarthritis risk: the impact of pregnancy and parental care.

BMC public health·2026

Same author

Utilizing Routine Care Data of Rare Diseases: Challenges, Chances and Call for Collaboration.

Studies in health technology and informatics·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

Comparing the performance of biomedical clustering methods.

Christian Wiwie¹, Jan Baumbach^1,2,3, Richard Röttger¹

¹Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

|September 22, 2015

Summary

No single clustering method excels across all biomedical data. This study evaluated 13 computational methods on diverse datasets, providing a guideline for selecting appropriate tools for gene expression and protein domain analysis.

More Related Videos

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

ExCYT: A Graphical User Interface for Streamlining Analysis of High-Dimensional Cytometry Data

ExCYT: A Graphical User Interface for Streamlining Analysis of High-Dimensional Cytometry Data

Published on: January 16, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Large-scale Reconstructions and Independent, Unbiased Clustering Based on Morphological Metrics to Classify Neurons in Selective Populations

Published on: February 15, 2017

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

ExCYT: A Graphical User Interface for Streamlining Analysis of High-Dimensional Cytometry Data

ExCYT: A Graphical User Interface for Streamlining Analysis of High-Dimensional Cytometry Data

Published on: January 16, 2019

Area of Science:

Bioinformatics
Computational Biology
Data Science

Background:

Identifying similar objects in biomedical data is crucial but challenging.
Manual clustering is infeasible, necessitating computational approaches.
Numerous clustering algorithms exist, but their comparative performance is unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

To comprehensively evaluate and compare 13 established computational clustering methods.
To assess method performance across diverse biomedical datasets, including gene expression and protein domains.
To develop a practical guideline for selecting optimal clustering tools in biomedical research.

Main Methods:

Performance evaluation of 13 clustering methods on 24 diverse biomedical datasets.
Utilized 13 common cluster validity indices for objective performance assessment.
Developed and employed the ClustEval platform for large-scale, reproducible analysis of over 4 million parameter sets.

Main Results:

No single clustering method demonstrated universal superiority across all evaluated datasets.
Performance varied significantly depending on the data type and specific algorithm parameters.
A guideline was developed to aid researchers in selecting appropriate clustering tools.

Conclusions:

The choice of clustering method significantly impacts biomedical data analysis outcomes.
The ClustEval platform facilitates reproducible and objective comparison of clustering tools.
The developed guideline assists researchers in making informed decisions for their specific data types.