Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
Published on: July 5, 2015
Self make-up: the influence of self-referential processing on attention orienting
Shuo Zhao1,2, Shota Uono3, Sayaka Yoshimura3
1Faculty of Human Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Eye gaze and arrows guide attention, but self-referential processing explains differences. Self-referential cues enhance attention to voice targets, suggesting gaze
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Attention Studies
Background:
- Eye gaze and arrows are potent attention-orienting cues in humans.
- Previous research highlights distinct attention-directing mechanisms between gaze and arrows.
- Self-referential processing is a potential underlying mechanism for these observed differences.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if self-referential processing mediates differences in attention orienting between gaze and arrow cues.
- To determine if self-referential cues differentially affect attention to voice versus tone targets.
- To explore the role of cue characteristics (biological vs. non-biological) in self-referential attention orienting.
Main Methods:
- Participants associated visual cues (arrows, faces) with 'self' or 'other' concepts.
- Auditory targets (voice, tone) were used to measure cueing effects.
- Experiment 2 manipulated participant experience to assess cue inherent properties.
Main Results:
- Self-referential cues, unlike other-referential cues, enhanced cueing effects for voice targets over tone targets.
- This effect occurred irrespective of whether the cue was biological (gaze) or non-biological (arrow).
- Experiment 2 demonstrated a reversible cueing pattern, indicating non-inherent differences.
Conclusions:
- The self-referential nature of eye gaze contributes to its unique attention-orienting properties compared to non-biological cues like arrows.
- Self-referential processing plays a significant role in modulating attention to different types of auditory stimuli.
- Differences in attention orienting between gaze and arrow cues are not innate but can be shaped by experience.
More Related Videos
13:00Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Self-Awareness and Its Effects
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior
Parallel Processing
Perception
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...
Introspection
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification