Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Special considerations while measuring blood pressure01:28

Special considerations while measuring blood pressure

1.5K
When assessing blood pressure (BP), healthcare professionals must consider various factors and potential unexpected outcomes to ensure accurate readings and provide proper patient care. Adhering to these guidelines is essential to achieving the most reliable results.
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
1.5K
Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure01:30

Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure

3.9K
Direct Method
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
3.9K
Measurement of Blood Pressure01:17

Measurement of Blood Pressure

4.0K
Assessing blood pressure is a standard procedure executed in virtually all medical environments. The method utilized today was established over a hundred years ago by an innovative Russian doctor, Dr. Nikolai Korotkoff. The soft ticking noise, known as Korotkoff sounds, heard while taking blood pressure readings results from turbulent blood flow within the vessels. The apparatus required for this procedure includes a sphygmomanometer, a blood pressure cuff attached to a gauge, and a...
4.0K
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure01:10

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

957
Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the...
957
Sites for measuring blood pressure01:21

Sites for measuring blood pressure

4.2K
Blood pressure measurement is a fundamental clinical procedure, providing crucial data for assessing cardiovascular health. Among the various sites for this measurement, the brachial and popliteal arteries are predominantly utilized due to their accessibility and the reliability of their readings. This lesson delves into the anatomical significance, methodology, and considerations of measuring blood pressure at these locations.
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
4.2K
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)01:15

Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)

1.4K
This procedural guide systematically measures blood pressure using an oscillometric digital sphygmomanometer, emphasizing accuracy, patient safety, and comfort.
Prepare for the Procedure:
1.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early outcomes of redo-TAVI with the SAPIEN 3 platform: the prospective, multicentre ReTAVI registry.

EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology·2026
Same author

Three-Year Outcomes After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With a Bioprosthetic Valve from the Multi-Centre IMPACT Registry.

Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery·2026
Same author

Streamlining postprocedural care after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

BMC cardiovascular disorders·2026
Same author

Impact of a Clinical Valve Coordinator on Hospital Length of Stay and Patient Outcomes: Results From the BENCHMARK Registry.

Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team·2026
Same author

An analysis of cost-saving in the German statutory health insurance system due to the introduction of epoetin alfa biosimilars in Germany.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Echocardiographic Results of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Women With Severe Aortic Stenosis: The RHEIA Trial.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Tilt Testing with Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure: a "Gold Standard" for Measuring Orthostatic Tolerance
14:09

Tilt Testing with Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure: a "Gold Standard" for Measuring Orthostatic Tolerance

Published on: March 21, 2013

22.2K

Validation protocols for blood pressure-measuring devices: status quo and development needs.

Beate Beime1, Cornelia Deutsch, Timothy Gomez

  • 1aInstitute for Pharmacology and Preventive Medicine, Cloppenburg bEstimate GmbH, Augsburg cKerckhoff Klinik Bad Nauheim, Rehabilitation Centre, Bad Nauheim, Germany dInstitute for Research and Medicine Advancement (IRMEDICA), Barcelona, Spain.

Blood Pressure Monitoring
|September 24, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Accurate blood pressure self-monitoring is crucial for cardiovascular health. This study compares four validation protocols for blood pressure devices, highlighting differences and suggesting improvements for standardization.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
05:51

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness

Published on: May 3, 2018

18.8K
Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care
14:28

Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care

Published on: May 10, 2024

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Tilt Testing with Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure: a "Gold Standard" for Measuring Orthostatic Tolerance
14:09

Tilt Testing with Combined Lower Body Negative Pressure: a "Gold Standard" for Measuring Orthostatic Tolerance

Published on: March 21, 2013

22.2K
Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
05:51

Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity Cf-PWV to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness

Published on: May 3, 2018

18.8K
Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care
14:28

Non-Invasive Monitoring of Microvascular Oxygenation and Reactive Hyperemia using Hybrid, Near-Infrared Diffuse Optical Spectroscopy for Critical Care

Published on: May 10, 2024

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Medical Devices
  • Clinical Validation

Background:

  • Hypertension significantly increases cardiovascular risks.
  • Accurate self-blood pressure monitoring devices are vital for patient care.
  • Existing validation protocols have evolved but retain distinct differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare four prominent blood pressure device validation protocols.
  • To identify unique advantages and limitations of each protocol.
  • To foster discussion on future improvements in validation guidelines.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of four established validation protocols.
  • Evaluation based on patient demographics, blood pressure ranges, and procedural length.
  • Review of protocol modifications and practical experiences.

Main Results:

  • Protocols differ in patient requirements, blood pressure ranges, and validation duration.
  • These variations lead to unique strengths and weaknesses in each method.
  • No single protocol is universally superior, necessitating careful selection.

Conclusions:

  • Standardization and continuous evolution of validation protocols are essential.
  • Ensuring the efficacy of blood pressure devices for clinical and home use is paramount.
  • Further research should focus on refining protocols for comprehensive device assessment.