Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

22.3K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
22.3K
Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

14.2K
How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
14.2K
What are Populations and Communities?00:30

What are Populations and Communities?

38.6K
Overview
38.6K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

1.3K
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
1.3K
Communication01:03

Communication

9.0K
Communication between two animals occurs when one animal transmits an information signal that causes a change in the animal that receives the information. Organisms communicate with one another in a host of different ways. Signals can be auditory, chemical, visual, tactile, or a combination of these. Communication is a critical behavioral adaptation that promotes survival, growth, and reproduction.
9.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Inhibitory inputs to avian ITD circuits.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

A general mechanism of airborne hearing in recent and early non-tympanate tetrapods.

The Journal of experimental biology·2026
Same author

Hearing and anatomy of the ear of the European hedgehog Erinaceus europaeus.

Biology letters·2026
Same author

An International Interdisciplinary Commentary on the Revised Guidelines for Music-based Interventions Checklist, Elaboration Guide and Validation Study.

Journal of music therapy·2026
Same author

Organization of the Auditory Brainstem in a Lizard, Gekko gecko. II. Afferent and Efferent Projections of Nuclei of the Lateral Lemniscus and the Torus Semicircularis.

The Journal of comparative neurology·2025
Same author

Zebra finches produce soft laryngeal whistles during thermal panting that are not adaptive vocal signals.

Current biology : CB·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents
06:25

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

1.6K

Sound Localization Strategies in Three Predators.

Catherine E Carr1, Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard

  • 1Department of Biology, University of Maryland Center for the Comparative and Evolutionary Biology of Hearing, College Park, Md., USA.

Brain, Behavior and Evolution
|September 24, 2015
PubMed
Summary

Predatory reptiles like alligators and geckos, along with barn owls, use distinct neural strategies for sound localization. These species differ in how their brains encode interaural time differences (ITDs) for spatial hearing.

More Related Videos

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals
08:28

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals

Published on: November 6, 2016

7.2K
An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:56

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

105

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents
06:25

A Real-Time Interactive System for Studying Confrontational Pursuit Behavior in Rodents

Published on: May 16, 2025

1.6K
Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals
08:28

Using Pharmacological Manipulation and High-precision Radio Telemetry to Study the Spatial Cognition in Free-ranging Animals

Published on: November 6, 2016

7.2K
An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners
07:56

An Automated System for Sound Localization Testing in Hearing-Impaired Listeners

Published on: March 13, 2026

105

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Comparative Biology

Background:

  • Sound localization is crucial for predatory behavior.
  • Interaural time differences (ITDs) are key cues for determining sound source direction.
  • Neural encoding of ITDs varies across species, reflecting evolutionary adaptations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare neural strategies for sound localization and ITD encoding in alligators, barn owls, and geckos.
  • To investigate evolutionary divergence in auditory processing between archosaurs and lepidosaurs.
  • To elucidate the neural mechanisms underlying spatial hearing in these predatory species.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of neural pathways involved in auditory processing.
  • Review of existing literature on ITD encoding mechanisms in the selected species.
  • Examination of neuronal response properties related to spatial sound perception.

Main Results:

  • Barn owls utilize a "place map" strategy with spatially tuned neurons for ITD encoding.
  • Geckos may employ a "meter" strategy or a population code with broadly sensitive neurons.
  • Alligators, as archosaurs, show distinct ITD encoding from lepidosaurs (geckos) despite similar auditory system organization.

Conclusions:

  • Archosaur and lizard auditory systems have evolved different neural strategies for encoding ITDs.
  • Neural codes for spatial hearing demonstrate significant evolutionary divergence.
  • Understanding these differences provides insight into the neural basis of auditory perception and predator-prey interactions.