Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Association Between Early Sport Specialization and Injury and Career Outcomes Among National Football League Athletes.

European journal of sport science·2026
Same author

Ketorolac use following operative clavicle fracture fixation is not associated with increased nonunion or surgical complications: A propensity-matched analysis.

Injury·2025
Same author

Methylprednisolone after shoulder arthroplasty leads to decreased opioid prescriptions without an increased risk of infection: A matched cohort analysis.

Journal of orthopaedics·2025
Same author

An Analysis of Fencing Injuries in the United States: A 10-Year Database Review.

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2025
Same author

Interference Screw versus Cement Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Soft Tissue Grafts: A Biomechanical Study.

The journal of knee surgery·2023
Same author

Is Insurance Status Associated With Likelihood of Operative ACL Injury Treatment Compared With Nonoperative Treatment?

Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.9K

Computerized 3D morphological analysis of glenoid orientation.

Soheil Ghafurian1, Balazs Galdi2, Sevag Bastian2

  • 1Department of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey.

Journal of Orthopaedic Research : Official Publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society
|September 25, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an automated computational framework for precise glenoid orientation measurement. The new method offers reproducible, observer-independent analysis crucial for total shoulder arthroplasty.

Keywords:
fulcrum axisglenoid orientationinclinationmorphometryversion

More Related Videos

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum
04:32

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum

Published on: March 19, 2017

8.0K
3D Ultrasound Imaging: Fast and Cost-effective Morphometry of Musculoskeletal Tissue
08:52

3D Ultrasound Imaging: Fast and Cost-effective Morphometry of Musculoskeletal Tissue

Published on: November 27, 2017

24.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography
06:09

Measuring 3D In-vivo Shoulder Kinematics using Biplanar Videoradiography

Published on: March 12, 2021

3.9K
Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum
04:32

Dissection, MicroCT Scanning and Morphometric Analyses of the Baculum

Published on: March 19, 2017

8.0K
3D Ultrasound Imaging: Fast and Cost-effective Morphometry of Musculoskeletal Tissue
08:52

3D Ultrasound Imaging: Fast and Cost-effective Morphometry of Musculoskeletal Tissue

Published on: November 27, 2017

24.5K

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Biomedical engineering
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Accurate glenoid orientation measurement is vital for shoulder pathology evaluation and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA).
  • Current methods for measuring glenoid version and inclination are often time-consuming, prone to observer variability, and sensitive to imaging alignment issues.
  • Standardized and reproducible glenoid measurements are needed to improve surgical planning and outcomes in TSA.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel computational framework for automated, 3D analysis of glenoid orientation.
  • To assess the reproducibility and observer independence of the proposed automated method.
  • To compare glenoid orientation measurements derived from different anatomical axes.

Main Methods:

  • A computational framework was developed for automated analysis of 3D surface data from 12 scapulae.
  • Glenoid cavity and external anatomical landmarks were automatically extracted from 3D models.
  • Glenoid version was calculated using both the scapular plane and a novel fulcrum axis.
  • Glenoid inclination was measured relative to the scapular transverse axis and a medial pole-inferior tip axis.

Main Results:

  • The automated framework successfully extracted reproducible morphological measures, free from inter- and intra-observer variability.
  • Mean (±SD) fulcrum-based glenoid version was -0.55° (±4.17°), compared to -5.05° (±3.50°) for scapular-plane-based version.
  • Mean (±SD) glenoid inclination (medial pole-inferior tip) was 12.75° (±5.03°), and 4.63° (±4.86°) using the medial pole and glenoid center.
  • The fulcrum axis was demonstrated to be nearly perpendicular to the glenoid plane normal in 3D.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed computational framework provides an automated, reproducible, and observer-independent method for quantifying 3D glenoid orientation.
  • The novel fulcrum-based glenoid version measurement offers a valuable alternative for assessing 3D glenoid orientation.
  • This automated approach has the potential to enhance preoperative planning and improve outcomes in total shoulder arthroplasty.