Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 3, 2026

Multiplexed Fluorescent Immunohistochemical Staining of Four Endometrial Immune Cell Types in Recurrent Miscarriage
Published on: August 4, 2021
Defining safe criteria to diagnose miscarriage: prospective observational multicentre study
Jessica Preisler1, Julia Kopeika2, Laure Ismail3
1Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea Hospital, Imperial College, London W12 0HS, UK.
Recent ultrasound criteria for diagnosing miscarriage are appropriate but may not account for gestational age. Current guidelines for repeat scan timing and findings are too lenient, risking misdiagnosis of viable pregnancies.
Area of Science:
- Early pregnancy assessment
- Clinical ultrasonography
- Reproductive medicine
Background:
- Diagnosing miscarriage relies on specific ultrasound measurements like crown-rump length (CRL) and mean gestational sac diameter (MSD).
- Recent changes in guidance have updated these cut-off values.
- The performance of these new criteria and optimal follow-up protocols require validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate updated cut-off values for CRL and MSD in diagnosing miscarriage.
- To assess the influence of gestational age on these measurements.
- To determine optimal scan intervals and findings for definitive pregnancy failure diagnosis.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, multicentre observational trial involving 2845 women with pregnancies of unknown viability.
- Transvaginal ultrasonography was used to measure MSD and CRL, and assess embryo heart activity.
- Follow-up scans were performed 7-14 days later, with final viability assessed at 11-14 weeks' gestation.
Main Results:
- Updated cut-off values (MSD ≥ 25 mm, CRL ≥ 7 mm) showed 100% specificity for miscarriage diagnosis at initial scans.
- Specific criteria for empty sacs and absent embryo heart activity also demonstrated 100% specificity.
- Repeat scan findings, such as persistent absence of embryo heart activity or lack of MSD growth, were highly specific for miscarriage.
Conclusions:
- The recently revised cut-off values for diagnosing miscarriage using ultrasound are appropriate but do not fully incorporate gestational age.
- Current recommendations for the timing and expected findings of follow-up scans appear too liberal.
- Protocols for miscarriage diagnosis need revision to incorporate these findings, preventing misdiagnosis and unnecessary termination of viable pregnancies.
More Related Videos
07:46Author Spotlight: Advancing Reproductive Immunology with a Protocol for the Quantitative Evaluation of Endometrial Immune Cells
Published on: October 13, 2023
07:04A Novel Use of Three-dimensional High-frequency Ultrasonography for Early Pregnancy Characterization in the Mouse
Published on: October 24, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies