Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Cognitive factors affecting sequential dependencies in differential eyelid conditioning.

J A Kadlac

    The Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science
    |July 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study on learning and memory found that awareness of conditioning rules reduced sequential dependencies. Unaware participants showed stronger effects, suggesting implicit learning plays a key role in conditioning.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The role of noun imagery in the speed of processing the grammaticality of adjective-noun phrases.

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    Eyelid response topography in differential interstimulus interval conditioning.

    Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory·1977
    See all related articles
    JoVE
    x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
    ABOUT JoVE
    OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
    AUTHORS
    Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
    LIBRARIANS
    TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
    RESEARCH
    JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
    EDUCATION
    JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
    Terms & Conditions of Use
    Privacy Policy
    Policies

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Neuroscience
    • Behavioral Science

    Background:

    • Sequential dependencies are crucial for understanding learning and memory.
    • Eyelid conditioning is a paradigm used to study associative learning.
    • Investigating factors like learning, masking, and subject awareness is key to understanding these dependencies.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine sequential dependencies in a two-stage differential eyelid conditioning experiment.
    • To determine the influence of learning, masking, and subject factors on these dependencies.
    • To explore the relationship between awareness of contingencies and the magnitude of sequential dependencies.

    Main Methods:

    • Differential eyelid conditioning was employed in a two-stage experiment.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjects were conditioned using Vanderplas and Garvin (1959) forms in Stage 1.
  • Stage 2 involved word conditional stimuli (CSs) with varied processing tasks (semantic, physical, none) and taxonomic categories.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant sequential dependencies were observed, with higher conditional response probabilities following CS+ trials.
    • These dependencies diminished over trials and were amplified by additional processing loads.
    • Effects varied based on response form (C-form vs. V-form) and subject awareness of contingencies.

    Conclusions:

    • The magnitude of sequential dependencies is inversely related to the subject's awareness of differential contingencies.
    • Implicit learning and the ability to utilize contingency information significantly impact associative learning.
    • Understanding awareness is critical for fully explaining sequential dependencies in conditioning paradigms.