Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Free Energy01:21

Free Energy

53.3K
Free energy—abbreviated as G for the scientist Gibbs who discovered it—is a measurement of useful energy that can be extracted from a reaction to do work. It is the energy in a chemical reaction that is available after entropy is accounted for. Reactions that take in energy are considered endergonic and reactions that release energy are exergonic. Plants carry out endergonic reactions by taking in sunlight and carbon dioxide to produce glucose and oxygen. Animals, in turn, break...
53.3K
An Introduction to Free Energy01:05

An Introduction to Free Energy

12.1K
How can we compare the energy that releases from one reaction to that of another reaction? We use a measurement of free energy to quantitate these energy transfers. Scientists call this free energy Gibbs free energy (abbreviated with the letter G) after Josiah Willard Gibbs, the scientist who developed the measurement. According to the second law of thermodynamics, all energy transfers involve losing some energy in an unusable form such as heat, resulting in entropy. Gibbs free energy...
12.1K
Gibbs Free Energy02:39

Gibbs Free Energy

41.2K
One of the challenges of using the second law of thermodynamics to determine if a process is spontaneous is that it requires measurements of the entropy change for the system and the entropy change for the surroundings. An alternative approach involving a new thermodynamic property defined in terms of system properties only was introduced in the late nineteenth century by American mathematician Josiah Willard Gibbs. This new property is called the Gibbs free energy (G) (or simply the free...
41.2K
Gibbs Free Energy and Thermodynamic Favorability02:23

Gibbs Free Energy and Thermodynamic Favorability

9.0K
The spontaneity of a process depends upon the temperature of the system. Phase transitions, for example, will proceed spontaneously in one direction or the other depending upon the temperature of the substance in question. Likewise, some chemical reactions can also exhibit temperature-dependent spontaneities. To illustrate this concept, the equation relating free energy change to the enthalpy and entropy changes for the process is considered:
9.0K
Encoding01:19

Encoding

1.0K
Information enters the brain through encoding, which is the input of information into the memory system. Once sensory information is received from the environment, the brain labels or codes it. The information is then organized with similar information and connected to existing concepts. Encoding occurs through automatic processing and effortful processing.
Automatic processing involves the encoding of details like time, space, frequency, and the meaning of words, usually done without conscious...
1.0K
The Central Dogma01:25

The Central Dogma

145.2K
Overview
145.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dubious Claims about Simplicity and Likelihood: Comment on Pinna and Conti (2019).

Brain sciences·2020
Same author

On Bayesian Simplicity in Human Visual Perceptual Organization.

Perception·2017
Same author

Human visual perceptual organization beats thinking on speed.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2017
Same author

A group theoretical model of symmetry cognition.

Acta psychologica·2016
Same author

A cognitive architecture account of the visual local advantage phenomenon in autism spectrum disorders.

Vision research·2015
Same author

A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations.

Psychological bulletin·2012

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 3, 2026

New Methods to Study Gustatory Coding
10:59

New Methods to Study Gustatory Coding

Published on: June 29, 2017

10.1K

Structural coding versus free-energy predictive coding.

Peter A van der Helm1

  • 1Laboratory of Experimental Psychology, University of Leuven (K.U. Leuven), Tiensestraat 102, Box 3711, Leuven, 3000, Belgium. peter.vanderhelm@ppw.kuleuven.be.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|September 27, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares free-energy (FE) predictive coding and structural coding for visual perception. While FE coding is a powerful model, structural coding offers greater explanatory power and a more compelling cognitive architecture.

Keywords:
Cognitive architectureFree-energy minimizationNeuronal synchronizationPerceptual organizationPredictive codingStructural coding

More Related Videos

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

11.0K
Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding
08:00

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding

Published on: October 3, 2025

874

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 3, 2026

New Methods to Study Gustatory Coding
10:59

New Methods to Study Gustatory Coding

Published on: June 29, 2017

10.1K
Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
11:18

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks

Published on: March 2, 2015

11.0K
Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding
08:00

Decoding Natural Behavior from Neuroethological Embedding

Published on: October 3, 2025

874

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Visual perceptual organization is key to understanding brain function.
  • Two prominent theories, free-energy (FE) predictive coding and structural coding, offer different frameworks for brain processing.
  • Both theories utilize the concept of free-energy minimization but differ in their formalization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To contrast the free-energy (FE) version of predictive coding with structural coding.
  • To evaluate the competence and performance of both theoretical approaches in explaining visual perception.
  • To assess their respective strengths in modeling brain function and cognitive architecture.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of two theoretical frameworks: FE predictive coding and structural coding.
  • Evaluation based on formal elaborations of free-energy minimization.
  • Assessment of explanatory power and cognitive architecture.

Main Results:

  • FE predictive coding formalizes free-energy minimization through prediction error minimization.
  • Structural coding formalizes free-energy minimization via minimization of descriptive complexity.
  • FE predictive coding demonstrates powerful modeling techniques but less explanatory power compared to structural coding.

Conclusions:

  • FE predictive coding offers a detailed account of neurophysiological data.
  • Structural coding provides a more compelling cognitive architecture, including formal support for neuronal synchronization.
  • Structural coding exhibits greater explanatory power for visual perceptual organization.