Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Accessible magnetic resonance imaging.

L Kaufman1, M Arakawa, J Hale

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco 94080.

Magnetic Resonance Quarterly
|October 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantifying physical degradation alongside recording and stimulation performance of 980 intracortical microelectrodes chronically implanted in three humans for 956-2246 days.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2024
Same author

Targeting neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) ameliorates inflammation in murine psoriasiform dermatitis.

Journal of dermatological science·2023
Same author

Localized myxedema histologically mimicking spindle cell lipoma.

Dermatology online journal·2022
Same author

A combined active shape and mean appearance model for the reconstruction of segmental bone loss.

Medical engineering & physics·2022
Same author

Time to first recurrence, pattern of recurrence, and survival after recurrence in endometrial cancer according to the molecular classification.

Gynecologic oncology·2022
Same author

Subepidermal type VII collagen speckles as an additional clue for diagnosing epidermolysis bullosa acquisita by salt-split skin serum analysis.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2022

Low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers a cost-effective diagnostic solution. This technology provides comparable performance to high-field systems, making advanced imaging more accessible.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Biophysics
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) costs are significantly influenced by magnetic field strength.
  • Prevailing misconceptions about field strength's impact on performance lead to unnecessarily expensive MRI systems.
  • High-field MRI systems present limitations in terms of cost, siting, and patient comfort.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To challenge the notion that high magnetic field strength is essential for diagnostic quality in MRI.
  • To explore the advantages of low-field MRI operation.
  • To introduce a practical, low-cost MRI system design.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of diagnostic quality factors in relation to magnetic field strength.
  • Development of a low-cost MRI system using an open-design permanent magnet.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Optimization of receiving antennas and acquisition sequences for low-field imaging.

    • Main Results:

    • Magnetic field strength is not a primary determinant of MRI system performance.
    • Low-field MRI offers benefits including lower costs, easier siting, shortened T1 times, higher contrast, reduced motion sensitivity, and lower radiofrequency power deposition.
    • The developed low-field system provides diagnostic-level performance with enhanced patient comfort and accessibility.

    Conclusions:

    • Low-field MRI systems can achieve effective diagnostic performance, challenging the necessity of high-field technology.
    • The described low-cost, open-design MRI system offers significant advantages in accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and patient experience.
    • This technology has the potential to broaden access to powerful MRI diagnostics for a larger patient population.