Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance01:39

Chromosomal Theory of Inheritance

61.3K
In 1866, Gregor Mendel published the results of his pea plant breeding experiments, providing evidence for predictable patterns in the inheritance of physical characteristics. The significance of his findings was not immediately recognized. In fact, the existence of genes was unknown at the time. Mendel referred to hereditary units as “factors.”
61.3K
Inheritance01:25

Inheritance

1.9K
Gregor Mendel's pioneering work on the principles of inheritance fundamentally transformed our understanding of how traits are transmitted from generation to generation. His experiments with pea plants laid the groundwork for the discovery of genes, discrete units within organisms that control heredity.
Each gene exists in pairs, and the combination of these genes from both parents forms an individual's genotype. This genotype is a blueprint of potential traits. Examples of genotype...
1.9K
Pedigree Analysis01:35

Pedigree Analysis

91.0K
Overview
91.0K
Pedigree Analysis01:35

Pedigree Analysis

19.1K
19.1K
Law of Segregation01:49

Law of Segregation

79.9K
When crossing pea plants, Mendel noticed that one of the parental traits would sometimes disappear in the first generation of offspring, called the F1 generation, and could reappear in the next generation (F2). He concluded that one of the traits must be dominant over the other, thereby causing masking of one trait in the F1 generation. When he crossed the F1 plants, he found that 75% of the offspring in the F2 generation had the dominant phenotype, while 25% had the recessive phenotype.
79.9K
Law of Independent Assortment02:03

Law of Independent Assortment

64.5K
While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.
64.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

HV&I Reviewer Highlight.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics·2026
Same author

<i>HV&I</i> Reviewer Highlight.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics·2026
Same author

<i>HV&I</i> Reviewer Highlight.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics·2026
Same author

<i>HV&I</i> Reviewer Highlight.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics·2026
Same author

<i>HV&I</i> Reviewer Highlight.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics·2026
Same author

Human vaccines and immunotherapeutics: News March 2025.

Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics·2026
Same journal

The host-microbiome dimension of ecological regime shifts.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

The emerging field of wild animal welfare science.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Integrating nutritional mutualists into the evolution of defense.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Formation of three great Asian plateaus, climate change, and biodiversity: (Trends Ecol. Evol. 40, 970-982; 2025).

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Digital twins as a tool for ecosystem research.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
Same journal

Constraint and convergence in the evolution of vertebrate sound production.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 2, 2026

High-throughput Screening for Protein-based Inheritance in S. cerevisiae
08:12

High-throughput Screening for Protein-based Inheritance in S. cerevisiae

Published on: August 8, 2017

6.8K

Lamarckian Illusions.

Adam Weiss1

  • 1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Max F. Perutz Laboratories, University of Vienna, Dr Bohrgasse 9/5; 1030 Vienna, Austria.

Trends in Ecology & Evolution
|September 29, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Lamarckian evolution is often used for non-Mendelian inheritance, but this article argues its revival is misleading. True evolutionary understanding requires accurate terminology, not outdated concepts.

Keywords:
CRISPRDarwinismLamarckism

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: RNAi Inheritance and ChIP in C. elegans
10:28

Author Spotlight: RNAi Inheritance and ChIP in C. elegans

Published on: May 5, 2023

5.0K
Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing
08:39

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Published on: September 1, 2017

8.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 2, 2026

High-throughput Screening for Protein-based Inheritance in S. cerevisiae
08:12

High-throughput Screening for Protein-based Inheritance in S. cerevisiae

Published on: August 8, 2017

6.8K
Author Spotlight: RNAi Inheritance and ChIP in C. elegans
10:28

Author Spotlight: RNAi Inheritance and ChIP in C. elegans

Published on: May 5, 2023

5.0K
Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing
08:39

Shifting Zebrafish Lethal Skeletal Mutant Penetrance by Progeny Testing

Published on: September 1, 2017

8.2K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Genetics
  • History of science

Background:

  • The term 'Lamarckian evolution' is popularly associated with inheritance of acquired characteristics.
  • This concept is often presented as a complement to Darwinian evolution.
  • Modern genetics has largely refuted Lamarckian inheritance mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the contemporary use of the term 'Lamarckian evolution'.
  • To argue against the unjustified revival of Lamarckian concepts in evolutionary biology.
  • To clarify the distinction between Lamarckian ideas and modern evolutionary synthesis.

Main Methods:

  • Historical analysis of evolutionary theories.
  • Conceptual analysis of inheritance mechanisms.
  • Review of current scientific literature on evolution and epigenetics.

Main Results:

  • The popular understanding of 'Lamarckian evolution' is often inaccurate and conflates different biological processes.
  • The term is misleading as it does not accurately represent modern genetic and evolutionary principles.
  • Contemporary phenomena sometimes mislabeled as Lamarckian are better explained by other mechanisms, such as epigenetics.

Conclusions:

  • Reintroducing 'Lamarckian evolution' is scientifically inaccurate and hinders clear communication.
  • Accurate terminology is crucial for understanding evolutionary biology.
  • Focus should remain on established Darwinian principles and modern evolutionary synthesis, incorporating new findings appropriately.