Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 2, 2026

Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Self-enhancement diminished
Patrick R Heck1, Joachim I Krueger1
1Department of Cognitive, Linguistic & Psychological Sciences, Brown University.
Abstract:
Self-enhancement is a positive bias in self-perception, which may imply error. However, conventional measures of self-enhancement are difference scores that do not distinguish a positive bias from a self-enhancement error, that is, they fail to identify those individuals who hold an irrationally or inaccurately positive view of themselves. We propose 2 new measures to separate error from bias. In the domain of personality judgment, we estimate a defensible bias and an enhancement error from individuals' actual and perceived similarity with others. In the domain of performance, we adapt a decision-theoretic framework to distinguish those who falsely believe to be better than average from those who actually are better. We illustrate the properties of these measures in 3 empirical studies and computer simulations. Implausibly high majorities of people consider themselves to be above average on various dimensions.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model
Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Strategies of Self-Presentation II: Self-Verification
Protecting Self-Esteem

