Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 2, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Low-dose adjunctive cilostazol in patients with complex lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Xin-Tian Zheng1, Kang-Yin Chen1, Tong Liu1
1Tianjin Key Laboratory of Ionic-Molecular Function of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Institute of Cardiology, Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Insights
Triple antiplatelet therapy with cilostazol significantly reduced major adverse cardiac events and myocardial infarction in patients with complex coronary lesions compared to dual antiplatelet therapy, without increasing bleeding risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Complex coronary lesions treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are associated with higher rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE).
- Intensified antiplatelet therapy may be beneficial for patients with complex coronary lesions undergoing PCI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy and safety of triple antiplatelet therapy (TAPT) versus dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in patients with complex coronary lesions undergoing PCI.
- To evaluate the impact of adjunctive low-dose cilostazol on ischemic events and bleeding complications.
Main Methods:
- A randomized trial involving 127 patients with complex coronary lesions undergoing PCI.
- Patients were assigned to either DAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel) or TAPT (aspirin plus clopidogrel plus low-dose cilostazol) for 3-6 months.
- Complex lesions included left main disease, severe 3-vessel disease, chronic total occlusions, true bifurcations, ostial lesions, severe calcifications, and highly thrombotic lesions.
Main Results:
- The TAPT group showed significantly lower incidences of myocardial infarction (1.6% vs 13.6%, P=0.018) and MACE (1.6% vs 16.7%, P=0.004) at one year compared to the DAPT group.
- No cases of stent thrombosis were observed in the TAPT group, whereas two occurred in the DAPT group.
- Adjunctive cilostazol did not significantly increase the incidence of major or minor bleeding events (26.2% vs 19.7%, P=0.381).
Conclusions:
- Low-dose adjunctive cilostazol in TAPT is superior to DAPT for reducing recurrent ischemic events in patients with complex coronary lesions undergoing PCI.
- TAPT demonstrated a similar bleeding profile to DAPT in this patient population.
Abstract:
Patients with complex coronary lesions undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have more major adverse cardiac events (MACE) than do those with simpler cases. Therefore, intensive antiplatelet therapy might be needed in these patients. A total of 127 patients with complex lesions undergoing PCI in the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University from October 2012 to April 2014 were randomized to receive either dual (aspirin plus clopidogrel, DAPT, n = 66), or triple antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel plus cilostazol; TAPT, n = 61). Patients in the TAPT group received low-dose cilostazol (100 mg loading, followed with 50 mg twice per day) for 3-6 months. The primary endpoint was composite MACE. The complex coronary target lesions were defined as at least one of the following: left main disease; severe 3-vessel disease; chronic total occlusion lesions; true bifurcation lesion; ostial lesions; severe calcified lesions; and highly thrombotic lesions. The two groups had similar baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics. One-year clinical outcomes showed that the TAPT group had significantly lower incidences of myocardial infarction (1.6% vs 13.6%, P = 0.018) and MACE (1.6% vs 16.7%, P = 0.004) than DAPT group. The DAPT group had two cases of stent thrombosis, while the TAPT group did not. Furthermore, adjunctive low-dose cilostazol didn't significantly increase the incidence of bleeding events (26.2% vs 19.7%, P = 0.381) regardless of major (4.9% vs 4.5%, P = 0.921) or minor (21.3% vs 15.2%, P = 0.368) bleeding events. In conclusion, low-dose adjunctive cilostazol seems superior to dual antiplatelet therapy in reducing recurrent ischemic events in patients with complex coronary lesions and the two test groups have a similar incidence of bleeding events.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Angina IV: Management
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...

