Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

4.2K
Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
4.2K
Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

3.9K
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
3.9K
Quantitative Analysis01:12

Quantitative Analysis

1.8K
Quantitative analysis is a technique for measuring the amount of specific constituents in a sample. When the sample's composition is unknown, qualitative analysis is performed first to identify its components, which ensures that the correct substances are measured during the quantitative phase.
In quantitative analysis, two key measurements are made: the sample quantity and a property proportional to the amount of the analyte (the substance being analyzed). This forms the basis of the...
1.8K
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

17.3K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
17.3K
Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test01:00

Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test

7.4K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
7.4K
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation01:19

Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation

3.2K
A complete procedure to test a claim about population standard deviation or population variance is explained here.
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
3.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Geographic disparities in kidney function decline: a matched cohort analysis of urban and rural populations in Korea.

Kidney research and clinical practice·2026
Same author

A Nationwide Study on Pretransfusion Testing for 10 Years in Korea Using Health Insurance Review and Assessment Claims Data.

Journal of Korean medical science·2026
Same author

Association of Presepsis Statin Prescription With Kidney and Mortality Outcomes: Cause-Specific, Overlap-Weighted Analyses.

Kidney medicine·2026
Same author

Essential Data Elements for Laboratory Test Interoperability: An Expert Consensus-Based Framework.

Annals of laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

When Direct LDL Cholesterol Assays Fail: a Case Series of Analytically Implausible Results.

Annals of laboratory medicine·2026
Same author

Deep-learning time-series anomaly detection of acute kidney injury from creatinine-eGFR trajectories in the ICU.

PLOS digital health·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 2, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

620

A novel quantitative evaluation method for quality control results.

Won-Ki Min1, Dae-Hyun Ko1, Eun Jung Cho1

  • 1Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.

Clinica Chimica Acta; International Journal of Clinical Chemistry
|September 30, 2015
PubMed
Summary

A new quantitative quality control procedure (QQCP) significantly improves error detection compared to traditional methods. This novel approach enhances laboratory quality control by providing more sensitive and timely identification of systematic errors (SEs).

Keywords:
Probability for error detectionQuality controlQuantitative quality control procedureWestgard multirule chart

More Related Videos

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

4.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 2, 2026

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control
05:47

Simulation of a Scaled Assembly Process with Collaboration of a Robotic Arm and Monitoring through a Vision System for Quality Control

Published on: August 29, 2025

620
Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
10:39

Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

Published on: August 29, 2025

1.3K
Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
05:58

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes

Published on: March 22, 2022

4.6K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Chemistry
  • Laboratory Medicine
  • Quality Control

Background:

  • Quality control (QC) is crucial for preventing systematic errors (SEs) in laboratory testing.
  • Current QC methods offer semi-quantitative assessments.
  • A novel quantitative QC procedure (QQCP) was developed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce and evaluate a novel quantitative QC procedure (QQCP).
  • To compare the performance of QQCP against the Westgard multirule method in detecting systematic errors.
  • To assess the probability of false rejection (Pfr) and error detection (Ped) for both methods.

Main Methods:

  • QC results were quantified using Z-scores.
  • Decision values were accumulated over runs (up to 30), with three per run.
  • Simulated QC data with systematic errors (SEs) from 0 to 3 standard deviations (SDs) were used to estimate Pfr and Ped for QQCP and Westgard methods.

Main Results:

  • QQCP demonstrated a Pfr of 3.4% at the 10th run.
  • With SEs of 0.5 SD and 1.0 SD, QQCP achieved Peds of 36.1% and 95.7% by run 10, respectively.
  • Error detection reached 100% by run 10 for SEs greater than 1.5 SDs, and >99% detection was achieved rapidly for higher SEs.

Conclusions:

  • The QQCP achieved up to a 3.3-fold higher error detection rate compared to the Westgard method.
  • Implementing QQCP can meet stringent quality goals based on biological variations.
  • QQCP offers a more sensitive and quantitative approach to laboratory quality control.