Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 2, 2026

12:03
A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
Published on: May 25, 2019
9.0K
Phasic stabilization of motor output after auditory and visual distractors
Harri Piitulainen1, Mathieu Bourguignon1, Eero Smeds1
1Brain Research Unit, Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, AALTO, Espoo, Finland.
Human Brain Mapping
|September 30, 2015
Summary
Distracting stimuli trigger covert startle responses, enhancing motor cortex activity and corticomuscular coherence to maintain steady force output during fine motor tasks.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Sensory Processing
Background:
- Maintaining steady motor output requires blocking distracting sensory stimuli.
- The primary motor cortex (M1) plays a crucial role in voluntary movement and motor control.
- Corticomuscular coherence (CMC) reflects the functional coupling between the motor cortex and muscles.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effects of brief auditory and visual distractors on the human primary motor cortex (M1).
- To examine how these distractors influence cortical rhythms, electromyogram (EMG) activity, and corticomuscular coherence (CMC).
- To understand the neural mechanisms underlying motor output stability when faced with sensory distractions.
Main Methods:
- Magnetoencephalography (MEG) was used to monitor cortical rhythms in M1.
- Electromyogram (EMG) of finger flexors was recorded during a right-hand pinch task.
- Auditory (1-kHz tones) and visual (checkerboard patterns) distractors were presented while measuring corticomuscular coherence (CMC).
Main Results:
- Both auditory and visual distractors induced covert startle-like responses, affecting force and EMG without visible movement.
- CMC and the rolandic ∼20-Hz rhythm were significantly enhanced for approximately 1 second following distractors.
- Directional coupling from muscle to M1 (EMG→MEG) increased after auditory distractors, suggesting startle-related proprioceptive input.
Conclusions:
- Task-unrelated distractors modulate corticospinal coupling at approximately 20 Hz.
- Distractors trigger covert startle responses and proprioceptive afference, leading to adjustments in corticospinal output to maintain motor task stability.
- Transient disengagement of attention from the fine-motor task likely contributes to the observed motor output readjustment.
Keywords:
cortex-muscle coherenceisometric contractionmagnetoencephalographysensorimotor cortexsensorimotor integrationstartle reflex
