[Retroperitoneal fibrosis in adults: Main characteristics and relevance of the diagnostic procedures based on a

B Lioger1, Y Yahiaoui2, J-E Kahn3

  • 1Service de médecine interne, université Francois-Rabelais, hôpital Bretonneau, CHU de Tours, 2, boulevard Tonnelé, 37044 Tours cedex 9, France.

La Revue De Medecine Interne
|September 30, 2015
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) diagnosis often lacks a clear cause. Most diagnostic tests, including biopsies and autoantibody screening, offer little value in identifying underlying conditions for RPF.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Rheumatology
  • Oncology

Background:

  • Retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF) is a rare condition involving fibro-inflammatory sheathing of retroperitoneal structures.
  • RPF can be idiopathic or secondary to other diseases.
  • A standardized diagnostic approach for RPF is lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the diagnostic utility of various tests in the work-up of retroperitoneal fibrosis.
  • To determine the relevance of invasive and non-invasive diagnostic procedures for RPF.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective multicenter study including 77 patients diagnosed with RPF.
  • RPF diagnosis defined by specific imaging criteria, excluding cancer-related fibrosis.
  • Analysis of data from biopsies (RPF, bone marrow) and serological tests (autoantibodies, tumor markers).

Main Results:

  • 80.5% of RPF cases were idiopathic.
  • RPF biopsies showed non-specific inflammatory or fibrotic lesions in 98% of cases.
  • Bone marrow biopsy identified one case of lymphoma; autoantibodies and tumor markers were not diagnostically useful.

Conclusions:

  • No underlying cause or associated disease was identified in the majority of RPF cases.
  • Non-invasive tests (autoantibodies, tumor markers, bone scintigraphy) and invasive tests (biopsies) have limited relevance for RPF diagnosis.
  • Diagnostic procedures for RPF were heterogeneous, with limited etiological findings.