Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

Measurement of Factor V Activity in Human Plasma Using a Microplate Coagulation Assay
Published on: September 9, 2012
Improving Anticoagulation Measurement Novel Warfarin Composite Measure
A new warfarin composite measure (WCM) better assesses patient outcomes and risks than separate measures of time in therapeutic range (TTR) and international normalized ratio (INR) variability. Clinic performance rankings also differ based on the chosen warfarin control metric.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Percent time in therapeutic range (TTR) and international normalized ratio (INR) variability are independent measures of warfarin control.
- Both TTR and INR variability are associated with patient outcomes.
- The current measures have limitations in assessing overall warfarin control and patient risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the advantages of a warfarin composite measure (WCM) for assessing patient outcomes.
- To determine how WCM compares to TTR and INR variability in predicting warfarin-related complications.
- To evaluate the impact of different warfarin control measures on anticoagulation clinic performance rankings.
Main Methods:
- A warfarin composite measure (WCM) was constructed by equally weighting standardized TTR and standardized log-transformed INR variability.
- Data from 103,897 warfarin-experienced patients across 100 anticoagulation clinics were used.
- Associations between WCM, TTR, INR variability, and outcomes (ischemic stroke, major bleeding, fatal bleeding) were analyzed in a subset of 40,404 patients with atrial fibrillation.
Main Results:
- WCM demonstrated the largest difference in hazard ratios for stroke and fatal bleeding between excellent and poorest control quintiles compared to TTR or log INR variability alone.
- The WCM did not show a significantly larger range for major bleeding compared to its components.
- Clinic performance rankings shifted considerably depending on whether TTR, INR variability, or WCM was used, with moderate agreement between WCM and its components, but weak agreement between TTR and INR variability.
Conclusions:
- WCM provides a broader assessment of warfarin-related risk, overcoming limitations of TTR and INR variability used separately.
- The choice of anticoagulation measure significantly impacts the performance evaluation of anticoagulation clinics.
- WCM offers a more comprehensive approach to evaluating warfarin control and patient outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management

