Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Mortality Risk Prediction: Can Comorbidity Indices Be Improved With Psychosocial Data?
Benjamin P Chapman1, Alexander Weiss, Kevin Fiscella
1*Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY †Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, South Bridge, Edinburgh, UK ‡Departments of Family Medicine and Community and Preventive Medicine, Family Medicine Research Programs, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester §Department of Health Policy and Management, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY ∥Harvard School of Public Health, Division of Social Epidemiology, Boston, MA.
Background:
Predicting risk of premature death is one of the most basic tasks in medicine and public health, but has proven to be difficult over the long term even with the best prognostic models. One popular strategy has been to improve prognostic models with candidate genes and other novel biomarkers. However, the gains in predictive power have been modest and the costs have been high, leading to a demand for cost-effective alternatives. We conducted a proof-of-principle investigation to examine whether simple, cheap, and noninvasive paper-and-pencil measures of social class and personality phenotype could improve the performance of one of the most widely used prediction models for all-cause mortality, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI).
Methods:
We used data from baseline and 25-year mortality follow-up of the UK Health and Lifestyle Study cohort. In a subset of the cohort, we first identified 5 psychosocial factors highly predictive of mortality: income, education, type A personality, communalism (preference for the company of others), and "lie" scale (a measure of denial, putatively associated with ill health). We then examined the predictive performance of the CCI with and without these measures in a validation subsample.
Results:
Across 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, and 25-year time horizons, the psychosocially augmented CCI showed substantially better discrimination [area under the receiver-operating curves (95% confidence interval) from 0.83 (0.81-0.85) to 0.84 (0.83-0.86)] than the CCI [area under the receiver-operating curves from 0.74 (0.71-0.76) to 0.77 (0.76-0.79)]. These translated into net reclassification improvements from 27% (23%-31%) to 35% (32%-38%) of survivors and from 23% (17%-30%) to 34% (17%-30%) of decedents; and 23%-42% reductions in the Number Needed to Screen. Calibration improved at all time horizons except 25 years, where it was decreased.
Conclusion:
Widespread attempts to improve prognostic models might consider not only novel biomarkers, but also psychosocial questionnaire measures.
Related Concept Videos
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Cancer Survival Analysis
Relative Risk
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...

