Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Law of Independent Assortment02:03

Law of Independent Assortment

64.5K
While Mendel’s Law of Segregation states that the two alleles for one gene are separated into different gametes, a different question of how different genes are inherited remains. For example, is the gene for tall plants inherited with the gene for green peas? Mendel asked this question by experimenting with a dihybrid cross; a cross in which both parents are homozygous for two distinct traits resulting in an F1 generation that are heterozygous for both traits.
64.5K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

388
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
388
Factorial Design02:01

Factorial Design

15.6K
Factorial Analysis is an experimental design that applies Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) statistical procedures to examine a change in a dependent variable due to more than one independent variable, also known as factors. Changes in worker productivity can be reasoned, for example, to be influenced by salary and other conditions, such as skill level. One way to test this hypothesis is by categorizing salary into three levels (low, moderate, and high) and skills sets into two levels (entry level...
15.6K
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

18.6K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
18.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Leishmania survives by exporting miR-146a from infected to resident cells to subjugate inflammation.

Life science alliance·2022
Same author

Specific emotions as mediators of the effect of intergroup contact on prejudice: findings across multiple participant and target groups.

Cognition & emotion·2016
Same author

Sowing the seeds of stereotypes: Spontaneous inferences about groups.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2015
Same journal

Publisher Correction: Towards a quantifiable measure of orthographic congruence between two languages.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Cognitive mechanism of creative thinking: Integrating the semantic network and spreading activation model.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

A tutorial on causal network simulation and exploration using the causalnet R package.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Analyzing multidimensional formal dynamic models in psychology: A tutorial using graphical tools.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

Reliability, bias, and computational cost of estimating the Bayes factor using bridge sampling and the Savage-Dickey density ratio.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same journal

A comparison of multivariate and univariate meta-analysis.

Behavior research methods·2026
See all related articles
  1. Home
  3. Evidence-based Recommendations For Designing Free-sorting Experiments.
  1. Home
  3. Evidence-based Recommendations For Designing Free-sorting Experiments.

Related Experiment Video

A Visual Guide to Sorting Electrophysiological Recordings Using 'SpikeSorter'
10:31

A Visual Guide to Sorting Electrophysiological Recordings Using 'SpikeSorter'

Published on: February 10, 2017

11.7K

Evidence-based recommendations for designing free-sorting experiments.

Simon J Blanchard1, Ishani Banerji2

  • 1Department of Marketing, McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, 37th and O Streets NW, Washington, DC, 20057, USA. sjb247@georgetown.edu.

Behavior Research Methods
|October 2, 2015

View abstract on PubMed

Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers explored how card-sorting task design choices impact participant engagement and outcomes. Design decisions significantly influence task completion rates, time spent, and participant satisfaction.

Keywords:
Card sortingExperimental designFree-sorting

More Related Videos

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K
A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

5.4K

Related Experiment Videos

A Visual Guide to Sorting Electrophysiological Recordings Using 'SpikeSorter'
10:31

A Visual Guide to Sorting Electrophysiological Recordings Using 'SpikeSorter'

Published on: February 10, 2017

11.7K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

3.1K
A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats
09:28

A Within-Subject Experimental Design using an Object Location Task in Rats

Published on: May 6, 2021

5.4K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • The card-sorting task is a versatile research method in psychology.
  • Its flexibility necessitates numerous design choices by researchers.
  • The impact of these design choices on participant behavior and outcomes is not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically investigate the effects of seven key card-sorting task design factors.
  • To provide empirical data on how design decisions influence participant engagement and task performance.
  • To offer evidence-based recommendations for optimizing card-sorting task design.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a fractional factorial experiment with over 1,000 online participants.
  • Administered 36 different sorting tasks, varying seven design factors.
  • Collected data on task completion, time spent, number of piles created, and post-task measures.

    • Main Results:

    • Specific design choices significantly affected the likelihood of participants quitting the task.
    • Task design factors influenced the time participants spent on the task.
    • Variations in design impacted the number of piles created and post-task satisfaction and depletion.

    Conclusions:

    • Researcher decisions in card-sorting task design have measurable consequences.
    • Empirical evidence supports specific recommendations for task design.
    • Optimizing design can improve participant experience and data quality in sorting tasks.