Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Carotid endarterectomy: why question it now?

S M Davis1, P C Gates

  • 1Neurology Unit, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC.

The Medical Journal of Australia
|January 2, 1989
PubMed
Summary

Carotid endarterectomy is a stroke prevention surgery questioned despite historical use. Current trials evaluate its effectiveness in symptomatic patients, balancing stroke risk reduction against surgical risks.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can We Miniaturize CT Technology for a Successful Mobile Stroke Unit Roll-Out?

Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference·2023
Same author

Transport of ice into the stratosphere and the humidification of the stratosphere over the 21<sup>st</sup> century.

Geophysical research letters·2018
Same author

Extinction and survival in two-species annihilation.

Physical review. E·2018
Same author

Self-reported and accelerometer-measured physical activity by body mass index in US Hispanic/Latino adults: HCHS/SOL.

Preventive medicine reports·2016
Same author

ICARUSS, the Integrated Care for the Reduction of Secondary Stroke trial: rationale and design of a randomized controlled trial of a multimodal intervention to prevent recurrent stroke in patients with a recent cerebrovascular event, ACTRN = 12611000264987.

International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society·2015
Same author

Names of infamy: tainted eponyms.

Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia·2015

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Vascular Surgery
  • Preventive Medicine

Background:

  • Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been a widely accepted stroke prevention method since the 1950s.
  • Despite its long-standing use, robust evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for its efficacy in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients is historically lacking.
  • The benefits and indications for CEA, particularly in asymptomatic patients, have been debated, and are now being re-evaluated even for symptomatic cases.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the historical context and current controversies surrounding carotid endarterectomy for stroke prevention.
  • To address the rationale behind ongoing and proposed large-scale randomized clinical trials evaluating CEA.
  • To examine the evidence supporting CEA in symptomatic versus asymptomatic carotid disease.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and historical data on carotid endarterectomy.
  • Analysis of the evidence from clinical trials, including symptomatic and asymptomatic patient cohorts.
  • Discussion of the risk-benefit analysis for individual patients undergoing CEA.

Main Results:

  • Available evidence suggests CEA, when performed by skilled surgeons, can reduce stroke incidence in symptomatic patients with minor ischemic events and significant ipsilateral carotid disease.
  • A perioperative morbidity and mortality rate exceeding 3% is considered unacceptable, underscoring the need for expert surgical performance.
  • The decision to perform CEA requires careful consideration of the potential stroke risk reduction versus the immediate surgical risks of stroke or death.

Conclusions:

  • The efficacy and precise role of carotid endarterectomy in stroke prevention remain subjects of ongoing investigation and debate.
  • New large-scale randomized trials are crucial for definitively establishing the benefits of CEA in specific patient populations.
  • Patient selection and surgical expertise are paramount for optimizing outcomes and minimizing risks associated with carotid endarterectomy.

Related Experiment Videos