Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026
Laparoscopic Non-Mesh Cerclage Pectopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: September 13, 2022
Reinforcing cerclage for a short cervix at follow-up after the primary cerclage procedure
Stephen A Contag1, Jesse Woo2, David B Schwartz1
1a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , University of Maryland School of Medicine , Baltimore , MD , USA .
Objective:
To determine whether a reinforcing cerclage (RC) for a short cervix measured after the primary cerclage procedure prolonged pregnancy.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 157 women with singleton gestations who underwent cerclage for standard indications. Women were grouped according to cervical length (CL) at the time of follow-up 1-2 weeks after the initial cerclage placement: ≥25 mm (106 women) and <25 mm with (20 women) or without RC (31 women). Gestational age (GA) at delivery was compared by ANOVA. Survival risk analysis was applied to model GA at delivery adjusted for indication and CL before and after the first cerclage.
Results:
Women with CL ≥25mm delivered later than women with CL < 25mm after the first cerclage (p < 0.01). RC did not delay delivery for women with CL < 25 mm (p = 0.17) after the primary procedure. Indication for the primary cerclage (p < 0.01) and CL (p < 0.01) after the primary cerclage were the best predictors for GA at delivery.
Conclusion:
Placement of RC for short cervix did not prolong duration of pregnancy, GA at delivery or modify the probability of preterm birth.
More Related Videos
03:30Author Spotlight: Advancing Pelvic Prolapse Treatment with a Non-Mesh Approach using Laparoscopic Pectopexy
Published on: October 25, 2024
05:21Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Knot-Tying for Uterine Vessel Occlusion during Hysterectomy with Cervical Cerclage in Large Uteri
Published on: September 12, 2025