Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026
Endaural Endoscopic Atticoantrotomy Retrograde Mastoidectomy using a Constant Suction Bone-drilling Technique
Published on: May 23, 2021
Aural foreign body extraction in children: a double-edged sword
Oyebanji Olajuyin1, Oladele Simeon Olatunya2
1Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria.
Insights
Foreign body removal in children
Area of Science:
- Otolaryngology
- Pediatric Medicine
- Medical Procedures
Background:
- Aural foreign bodies are a common pediatric concern worldwide.
- Procedural complications during extraction are a significant risk.
- This study analyzes complications associated with pediatric aural foreign body removal.
Purpose of the Study:
- To describe procedural complications of aural foreign body extraction in children.
- To identify factors influencing complication rates.
- To provide recommendations for reducing complications.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 136 pediatric cases with aural foreign bodies.
- Categorization of foreign bodies into graspable and non-graspable.
- Extraction of patient data, removal techniques, and complication rates.
Main Results:
- Complication rates were significantly higher when treated by non-otolaryngologists (68.1%) versus otolaryngologists (15.7%).
- Non-graspable foreign bodies had a higher complication rate (44.4%) than graspable ones (28.6%).
- One case resulted in severe hearing loss due to a complicated removal attempt.
Conclusions:
- Procedural complications are inherent risks in pediatric aural foreign body extraction.
- Healthcare providers should recognize their limitations and adhere to referral criteria.
- Referral to otolaryngology is recommended for foreign bodies in the only hearing ear and failed first attempts.
Introduction:
Foreign body insertion into the ear in children is common world-wide. The goal of this work is to describe the procedural complications of aural foreign body extraction in children.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis of records of children with aural foreign bodies was conducted. Patients' bio data, type of foreign bodies, referrals, techniques of removal and complications were extracted from the case files. The foreign bodies were categorized into graspable and non-graspable objects. Patients with complications caused directly by the foreign body were excluded.
Results:
There were 136 cases. Eighty-seven (64.0%) were males while forty-nine (36.0%) were females. Their age range from 5 days to 16 years with 109 (80.2%) aged below 8 years. Eighty-nine (65.4%) and 47 (34.6%) cases were treated by otolaryngologists and non-otolaryngologists with a complication rate of 15.7% and 68.1% respectively. One case suffered severe hearing loss following complicated attempt at removing foreign body in the only hearing ear. Overall, the complication rate was higher (44.4%) with removal of non-graspable than (28.6%) with graspable objects.
Conclusion:
Procedural complication is an ever-present hazard of aural foreign body extraction in children. Its occurrence can be prevented or largely reduced if health care-givers know their limitation based on their clinical skills and acquaint themselves with established criteria for referral. As a rule, we suggest that, foreign body in the only hearing ear and failed attempted first removal should be considered criteria for otolaryngologic referral.
