Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

08:02
Dissection and Flat-mounting of the Threespine Stickleback Branchial Skeleton
Published on: May 7, 2016
10.5K
Top predators induce the evolutionary diversification of intermediate predator species
Jian Zu1, Bo Yuan1, Jianqiang Du2
1School of Mathematics and Statistics, Xi׳an Jiaotong University, Xi׳an 710049, PR China.
Journal of Theoretical Biology
|October 4, 2015
Summary
Evolutionary branching in predator-prey systems can occur due to trade-offs. Mildly decelerating costs may lead to diversification, potentially resulting in stable predator populations or extinction.
Area of Science:
- Ecology
- Evolutionary Biology
- Theoretical Ecology
Background:
- Tritrophic food chains involve complex predator-prey interactions.
- Adaptive dynamics theory models evolutionary change in populations.
- Intermediate predators face trade-offs between foraging and defense.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze evolutionary branching in intermediate predators within a tritrophic food chain.
- To identify trade-off properties leading to evolutionary stability or branching.
- To investigate the long-term outcomes of predator diversification.
Main Methods:
- Utilizing adaptive dynamics theory to model evolutionary processes.
- Analyzing the impact of trade-off relationships on predator evolution.
- Identifying conditions for continuously stable strategies and evolutionary branching points.
Main Results:
- Accelerating costs near a singular strategy result in a continuously stable strategy.
- Mildly decelerating costs near a singular strategy can lead to evolutionary branching.
- Post-branching outcomes depend on trade-off shape and strength, leading to stable dimorphism or extinction.
Conclusions:
- Trade-off characteristics are critical determinants of evolutionary outcomes in intermediate predators.
- Evolutionary branching can lead to stable coexistence of predator lineages or the loss of one lineage.
- This study provides insights into the diversification mechanisms in ecological communities.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
22.3K
Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.
22.3K
Types of Selection
46.4K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
46.4K
Speciation Rates
23.5K
Overview
23.5K
Limits to Natural Selection
36.0K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
36.0K
The Evidence for Evolution
50.1K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
50.1K
Frequency-dependent Selection
24.5K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
24.5K

