Physician specialty and variation in carotid revascularization technique selected for Medicare patients
Jessica B Wallaert1, Brian W Nolan1, David H Stone1
1Division of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.
Insights
Carotid revascularization rates declined, but carotid artery stenting (CAS) use increased, varying regionally. Physician specialty, particularly cardiologists, influences CAS adoption, necessitating multidisciplinary guidelines.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Health Services Research
- Medical Economics
Background:
- Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
- Physician specialty may influence the choice between CAS and CEA.
- Regional variations in CAS and CEA utilization are not well understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the hypothesis that physician specialty influences the choice between CAS and CEA.
- To examine regional variations in the utilization of CAS and CEA.
- To analyze trends in CAS and CEA use from 2002 to 2010.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of Medicare claims data from 2002 to 2010.
- Calculation of annual rates for CAS and CEA.
- Assessment of regional CAS utilization across hospital referral regions.
- Examination of patient factors, physician specialty, and regional CAS use.
Main Results:
- Overall carotid revascularization decreased by 30%; CEA declined 35%, while CAS increased 5%.
- Significant geographic variation in revascularization rates and procedure type (CAS vs. CEA) was observed.
- Cardiologists performed the majority of CAS procedures (49%) and doubled their CAS rates.
Conclusions:
- Significant regional variation exists in carotid revascularization rates and the proportion of CAS procedures.
- The increased utilization of CAS is associated with the proportion of cardiologists in a region.
- Developing evidence-based guidelines for carotid revascularization requires a multidisciplinary approach.
Objective:
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has become an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for select patients with carotid atherosclerosis. We hypothesized that the choice of CAS vs CEA varies as a function of treating physician specialty, which would result in regional variation in the relative use of these treatment types.
Methods:
We used Medicare claims (2002-2010) to calculate annual rates of CAS and CEA and examined changes by procedure type over time. To assess regional preferences surrounding CAS, we calculated the proportion of revascularizations by CAS, across hospital referral regions, defined according to the Dartmouth Atlas of Healthcare. We then examined relationships between patient factors, physician specialty, and regional use of CAS.
Results:
The annual number of all carotid revascularization procedures decreased by 30% from 2002 to 2010 (3.2 to 2.3 per 1000; P = .005). Whereas rates of CEA declined by 35% during these 8 years (3.0 to 1.9 per 1000; P < .001), CAS utilization increased by 5% during the same interval (0.30 to 0.32 per 1000; P = .014). Variation in utilization of carotid revascularization varied across the Unites States, with some regions performing as few as 0.7 carotid procedure per 1000 beneficiaries (Honolulu, Hawaii) and others performing nearly 8 times as many (5.3 per 1000 in Houma, La). Variation in procedure type (CEA vs CAS) was evident as well, as the proportion of carotid revascularization procedures that were constituted by CAS varied from 0% (Casper, Wyo, and Meridian, Miss) to 53% (Bend, Ore). The majority of CAS procedures were performed by cardiologists (49% of all CAS cases), who doubled their rates of CAS during the study period from 0.07 per 1000 in 2002 to 0.15 per 1000 in 2010.
Conclusions:
Variation in rates of carotid revascularization exists. Whereas rates of carotid revascularization have declined by more than 30% in recent years, utilization of CAS has increased. The proportion of all carotid revascularization procedures performed as CAS varies markedly by geographic region, and regions with the highest proportion of cardiologists perform the most CAS procedures. Evidence-based guidelines for carotid revascularization will require a multidisciplinary approach to ensure uniform adoption across specialties that care for patients with carotid artery disease.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care


