Physician specialty and variation in carotid revascularization technique selected for Medicare patients

Jessica B Wallaert1, Brian W Nolan1, David H Stone1

  • 1Division of Vascular Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH.

Insights

Carotid revascularization rates declined, but carotid artery stenting (CAS) use increased, varying regionally. Physician specialty, particularly cardiologists, influences CAS adoption, necessitating multidisciplinary guidelines.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Economics

Background:

  • Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
  • Physician specialty may influence the choice between CAS and CEA.
  • Regional variations in CAS and CEA utilization are not well understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the hypothesis that physician specialty influences the choice between CAS and CEA.
  • To examine regional variations in the utilization of CAS and CEA.
  • To analyze trends in CAS and CEA use from 2002 to 2010.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of Medicare claims data from 2002 to 2010.
  • Calculation of annual rates for CAS and CEA.
  • Assessment of regional CAS utilization across hospital referral regions.
  • Examination of patient factors, physician specialty, and regional CAS use.

Main Results:

  • Overall carotid revascularization decreased by 30%; CEA declined 35%, while CAS increased 5%.
  • Significant geographic variation in revascularization rates and procedure type (CAS vs. CEA) was observed.
  • Cardiologists performed the majority of CAS procedures (49%) and doubled their CAS rates.

Conclusions:

  • Significant regional variation exists in carotid revascularization rates and the proportion of CAS procedures.
  • The increased utilization of CAS is associated with the proportion of cardiologists in a region.
  • Developing evidence-based guidelines for carotid revascularization requires a multidisciplinary approach.
Abstract