Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Achievement of a physiological birth: insights from a qualitative study on women's motivations and decisions.

Sexual & reproductive healthcare : official journal of the Swedish Association of Midwives·2026
Same author

Influence of In Vitro Fertilization and embryo transfer procedures on the risk of ectopic pregnancy.

Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction·2026
Same author

Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: Update of French guidelines after the implementation of HPV screening.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2025
Same author

Assessing the impact of a regional multidisciplinary team meeting for endometriosis using the Covotem<sup>Ⓡ</sup> online platform.

Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction·2025
Same author

Evaluation of the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on obstetric perineal tears.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2025
Same author

Perineal deformation during forceps, vacuum and OdonAssist™ assisted vaginal deliveries: A simulation study based on advanced image processing.

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology·2025
Same journal

[Neuroprotection for preterm infants with antenatal magnesium sulphate].

Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction·2017
Same journal

[Is universal screening for cervical length among singleton pregnancies with no history of preterm birth justified?]

Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction·2017
Same journal

[Lifestyle recommendations for prevention of spontaneous preterm birth in asymptomatic pregnant women].

Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction·2017
Same journal

[Guidelines for clinical practice: Prevention of spontaneous preterm birth (excluding preterm premature rupture of membranes) - Introduction].

Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction·2017
Same journal

[Psychological aspects of abortion].

Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction·2016
Same journal

[Induced abortion: Guidelines for clinical practice - Introduction].

Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction·2016
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 1, 2026

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
08:49

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

Published on: June 6, 2020

16.1K

[Can we decrease cesarean rate at a university hospital treating high risk pregnancies?].

C Lembrouck1, N Mottet1, A Bourtembourg1

  • 1Pôle mère-femme, CHRU de Besançon, 3, boulevard Fleming, 25000 Besançon, France.

Journal De Gynecologie, Obstetrique Et Biologie De La Reproduction
|October 5, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Reducing cesarean rates in high-risk pregnancies is achievable through clinical practice changes. Key strategies include increased vaginal birth trials for breech presentations and improved labor induction selection, without compromising neonatal outcomes.

Keywords:
Cesarean rateClassification de RobsonLabour ward treating high risk pregnanciesMaternité niveau IIIRobson classificationTaux de césarienne

More Related Videos

Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Knot-Tying for Uterine Vessel Occlusion during Hysterectomy with Cervical Cerclage in Large Uteri
05:21

Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Knot-Tying for Uterine Vessel Occlusion during Hysterectomy with Cervical Cerclage in Large Uteri

Published on: September 12, 2025

703
Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
05:46

Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation

Published on: January 17, 2019

10.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 1, 2026

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
08:49

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

Published on: June 6, 2020

16.1K
Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Knot-Tying for Uterine Vessel Occlusion during Hysterectomy with Cervical Cerclage in Large Uteri
05:21

Laparoscopic Extracorporeal Knot-Tying for Uterine Vessel Occlusion during Hysterectomy with Cervical Cerclage in Large Uteri

Published on: September 12, 2025

703
Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
05:46

Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation

Published on: January 17, 2019

10.8K

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Public Health

Background:

  • High cesarean rates pose risks to maternal and neonatal health.
  • University hospitals managing high-risk pregnancies face unique challenges in optimizing delivery modes.
  • Previous studies highlight the need to identify effective strategies for cesarean rate reduction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify clinical practice changes responsible for a significant decrease in cesarean rates at a high-risk pregnancy university hospital.
  • To verify that this reduction did not lead to an increase in neonatal morbidity or mortality.

Main Methods:

  • A descriptive retrospective study comparing patients from 2003 and 2012.
  • Analysis of cesarean rates using Robson classification, maternal/obstetrical characteristics, and indications.
  • Comparison of maternal, obstetrical, and neonatal characteristics between the two study years.

Main Results:

  • Cesarean rates decreased from 19.2% to 15.5% between 2003 and 2012.
  • Key factors included increased vaginal deliveries for breech presentations and fewer cesareans after labor induction.
  • Reduced elective cesareans and increased successful vaginal birth trials were observed, with no negative impact on neonatal outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • Clinical practice modifications, including encouraging vaginal birth trials for breech presentations and refined labor induction protocols, can lower cesarean rates in high-risk settings.
  • Careful case-by-case analysis and continuous evaluation of clinical practices are essential for optimizing delivery outcomes.
  • Avoiding elective cesareans for indications like multiple pregnancies and scarred uterus is crucial, emphasizing the importance of restricting primary cesarean indications.