Minimally invasive surgery for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a meta-analysis

Y Zhu1, Y Wu2, Q Pu1

  • 1Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No 37, Guo Xue Xiang, 610041, Chengdu, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

Insights

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) repair shows lower mortality and complications than open surgery. However, MIS is linked to a higher recurrence rate, necessitating careful consideration in surgical approach selection.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Surgical Innovation
  • Hernia Repair

Background:

  • Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a serious condition requiring surgical intervention.
  • Traditional open surgical repair has been the standard approach for CDH.
  • Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) offers potential advantages in surgical outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the safety and efficacy of MIS versus traditional open surgery for CDH.
  • Evaluate key post-operative outcomes including mortality, recurrence, and complications.
  • Assess the use of prosthetic patches in both surgical approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane central register.
  • Inclusion of nine non-randomized historical control trials involving 507 patients.
  • Analysis of post-operative mortality, hernia recurrence, patch use, and complication rates.

Main Results:

  • MIS group demonstrated significantly lower post-operative mortality (RR 0.26, p=0.006).
  • MIS group showed a higher incidence of hernia recurrence (RR 3.42, p<0.00001).
  • MIS group had fewer surgical complications (RR 0.66, p=0.02), with similar patch use rates.

Conclusions:

  • MIS for CDH repair is associated with reduced post-operative mortality and morbidity.
  • Increased risk of CDH recurrence with MIS requires careful attention.
  • Further high-quality prospective trials are needed to definitively evaluate MIS versus open repair for CDH.

Related Concept Videos