Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
Published on: September 16, 2015
Commentary: The Lucid Interval-Coping with Unscientific Terminology.
1Dr. Rodgers is Clinical Associate Professor, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ. Dr. Baird is Honorary Consultant Forensic Psychiatrist, Greater Glasgow and Clyde Health Board, Glasgow, Scotland. carlarodgers@comcast.net.
The term "lucid interval" inaccurately describes fluctuating mental states in dementia patients. Courts using this outdated term may lead to unjust legal outcomes for individuals with cognitive impairment.
Area of Science:
- Psychiatry
- Neurology
- Forensic Psychology
Background:
- The term "lucid interval" is historically used to describe a period of apparent mental clarity in individuals with certain neurological or psychiatric conditions.
- This concept has been applied in legal contexts to assess the competency of individuals, particularly those with dementia.
- Recent scientific understanding suggests that the mental status of demented individuals fluctuates in ways not accurately captured by the "lucid interval" concept.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critique the continued use of the term "lucid interval" in legal and psychiatric contexts.
- To advocate for the re-evaluation of outdated terminology in psychiatry that may impact legal judgments.
- To highlight the potential for unjust outcomes when legal competency is assessed using non-scientific or anachronistic terms.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and critical analysis of the term "lucid interval" in scientific and legal discourse.
- Comparison of historical understanding of "lucid interval" with current knowledge of fluctuating mental status in dementia.
- Examination of the implications of using such terminology in legal competency evaluations.
Main Results:
- Agreement with Shulman et al. that "lucid interval" is an inadequate descriptor for the fluctuating mental status observed in dementia.
- Confirmation that the application of this term by courts can lead to inequitable decisions regarding competency.
- Identification of a broader need within psychiatry to address and update antiquated, non-scientific terminology.
Conclusions:
- The term "lucid interval" is scientifically inaccurate and should be abandoned in discussions of dementia and fluctuating mental status.
- Legal systems must move beyond outdated terminology to ensure fair competency assessments for individuals with cognitive impairments.
- Psychiatry should proactively revise its lexicon to reflect current scientific understanding, thereby improving the accuracy of legal and clinical evaluations.
More Related Videos
16:23Automated, Quantitative Cognitive/Behavioral Screening of Mice: For Genetics, Pharmacology, Animal Cognition and Undergraduate Instruction
Published on: February 26, 2014
05:22Dissociation of the Confounding Influences of Expectancy and Integrative Difficulty Residing in Anomalous Sentences in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: May 9, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Anatomical Terminology
Coping Strategies: Problem Focused
For example, consider a student who struggles to understand their...
Coping Strategies: Emotion Focused
The Scientific Method
The Scientific Method
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method