Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

The WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device for Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: February 28, 2012
Different risk factors for bleeding and discontinuation between dabigatran and rivaroxaban
Masami Nishino1, Naotaka Okamoto1, Akihiro Tanaka1
1Division of Cardiology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Osaka, Japan.
Insights
Discontinuation rates were higher for dabigatran compared to rivaroxaban. Rivaroxaban use with antiplatelet therapy requires caution due to bleeding risk factors.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Uncertainty exists regarding differing risk factors for bleeding and discontinuation between dabigatran and rivaroxaban.
- Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are crucial in managing atrial fibrillation.
- Comparative studies are needed to guide clinical decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the incidence of bleeding and discontinuation between dabigatran and rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation.
- To identify potential risk factors associated with bleeding for each anticoagulant.
- To inform clinical practice regarding the use of these NOACs.
Main Methods:
- Prospective enrollment of consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation receiving either dabigatran or rivaroxaban.
- Inclusion criteria: CHADS2 score >1 and creatinine clearance >30ml/min.
- One-year follow-up to compare clinical data, demographic data, and bleeding incidence.
Main Results:
- The study included 177 patients on dabigatran and 179 on rivaroxaban.
- Discontinuation rates were significantly higher in the dabigatran group (27.7%) versus the rivaroxaban group (13.4%).
- Antiplatelet therapy was identified as an independent risk factor for bleeding in the rivaroxaban group, but not in the dabigatran group.
Conclusions:
- Risk factors for bleeding may differ between dabigatran and rivaroxaban.
- Rivaroxaban should be used cautiously or avoided in patients on antiplatelet therapy to mitigate bleeding risk.
- Rivaroxaban appears more favorable than dabigatran concerning discontinuation rates.
Background:
It is unclear whether risk factors for bleeding and discontinuation are different between dabigatran and rivaroxaban.
Methods And Results:
We enrolled consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation who received dabigatran or rivaroxaban, had a CHADS2 score >1 and creatinine clearance >30ml/min. During this period, only dabigatran and rivaroxaban were available as non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in our hospital. We compared the clinical and demographic data and the incidence of bleeding for one year between dabigatran group and rivaroxaban group. As a result, the dabigatran group consisted of 177 patients and the rivaroxaban group consisted of 179 patients. The incidence of discontinuation was significantly higher in the dabigatran group than in the rivaroxaban group (27.7% vs. 13.4%, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis, even after propensity score-matching analysis, revealed that there were no independent risk factors for bleeding in the dabigatran group, while in the rivaroxaban group, use of antiplatelet therapy was an independent factor correlating with bleeding.
Conclusions:
The risk factors for bleeding may be different between dabigatran and rivaroxaban. To avoid bleeding, rivaroxaban should be prescribed with caution or avoided in patients using antiplatelet therapy. Upon discontinuation, rivaroxaban may be more favorable than dabigatran.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Disorders of Hemostasis
Thromboembolic Disorders
Two factors primarily cause thromboembolic conditions.
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Drug Toxicity: Risk factors
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management

