Globe stability during simulated vitrectomy with valved and non-valved trocar cannulas
Dina Joy Abulon1, Martin Charles2, Daniel E Charles2
1Global Medical Affairs, Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Lake Forest, CA, USA.
Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
|October 8, 2015
Summary
Valved cannulas significantly improve intraocular pressure (IOP) control and reduce fluid leakage and vitreous incarceration during simulated vitrectomy compared to non-valved cannulas.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Surgical Technology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Maintaining stable intraocular pressure (IOP) is critical during vitrectomy.
- Fluid leakage and vitreous incarceration are potential complications.
- Cannula design may influence surgical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of valved versus non-valved cannulas.
- To assess the impact on intraocular pressure (IOP).
- To evaluate fluid leakage and vitreous incarceration during simulated vitrectomy.
Main Methods:
- Simulated vitrectomy performed on rubber, acrylic, rabbit, and porcine eyes.
- Used 23-, 25-, and 27-gauge valved and non-valved trocar cannulas.
- Measured IOP, fluid leakage, and analyzed vitreous incarceration.
Main Results:
- Valved cannulas maintained IOP and prevented leakage, unlike non-valved ones.
- Non-valved cannulas showed significant IOP loss and fluid leakage.
- Valved cannulas significantly reduced vitreous incarceration compared to non-valved cannulas.
Conclusions:
- Valved cannulas offer superior performance in maintaining IOP.
- Valved cannulas effectively prevent fluid leakage during vitrectomy.
- Valved cannulas significantly reduce the risk of vitreous incarceration.


