Retrospective Derivation and Validation of an Automated Electronic Search Algorithm to Identify Post Operative
M Tien1, R Kashyap2, G A Wilson3
1Mayo Clinic, College of Medicine , Rochester, MN, United States.
Applied Clinical Informatics
|October 9, 2015
Summary
An electronic search algorithm effectively identifies postoperative complications like deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism after hip or knee surgery. This tool accelerates research and improves patient care with high accuracy compared to manual review.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Clinical Research
- Surgical Outcomes
Background:
- Electronic medical records (EMRs) are increasingly adopted in hospitals.
- Electronic search algorithms can aid in identifying postoperative complications.
- This can expedite data abstraction and clinical research for improved patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate an electronic search algorithm.
- The algorithm aims to identify specific postoperative complications: deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and myocardial infarction.
- The focus is on complications occurring within 30 days of total hip or knee arthroplasty.
Main Methods:
- A large cohort of 34,517 patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty was identified.
- An electronic search algorithm was iteratively developed and refined using a derivation cohort (418 patients).
- The algorithm was validated on an independent cohort (2,857 patients), comparing its performance to manual chart review.
Main Results:
- The algorithm demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for all targeted complications in both derivation and validation cohorts.
- For deep vein thrombosis, sensitivity ranged from 91%-97% and specificity from 85%-99%.
- For pulmonary embolism, sensitivity was 96%-97% and specificity 100%; for myocardial infarction, sensitivity was 100% and specificity 95%-99%.
Conclusions:
- An electronic search strategy was successfully derived and validated.
- This strategy significantly accelerates data abstraction for research and quality improvement.
- The electronic approach maintains superb reliability compared to manual chart review, enhancing patient care.


