Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Hyperscanning Study in Psychological Counseling
Published on: January 17, 2025
Psychometric evaluation of the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR)
Julie Williams1, Mary Leamy2, Francesca Pesola2
1Julie Williams, MSc, Mary Leamy, PhD, Francesca Pesola, PhD, Victoria Bird, PhD, Clair Le Boutillier, MSc, Mike Slade, PhD, King's College London, Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, London, UK julie.williams@kcl.ac.uk.
Background:
Supporting recovery is the aim of national mental health policy in many countries. However, only one measure of recovery has been developed in England: the Questionnaire about the Process of Recovery (QPR), which measures recovery from the perspective of adult mental health service users with a psychosis diagnosis.
Aims:
To independently evaluate the psychometric properties of the 15- and 22-item versions of the QPR.
Method:
Two samples were used: data-set 1 (n = 88) involved assessment of the QPR at baseline, 2 weeks and 3 months. Data-set 2 (n = 399; trial registration: ISRCTN02507940) involved assessment of the QPR at baseline and 1 year.
Results:
For the 15-item version, internal consistency was 0.89, convergent validity was 0.73, test-retest reliability was 0.74 and sensitivity to change was 0.40. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the 15-item version offered a good fit. For the 22-item version, the interpersonal subscale was found to underperform and the intrapersonal subscale overlaps substantially with the 15-item version.
Conclusions:
Both the 15-item and the intrapersonal subscale of the 22-item versions of the QPR demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties. The 15-item version is slightly more robust and also less burdensome, so it can be recommended for use in research and clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Cochran's Q Test
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

