Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 1, 2026

Experience is Instrumental in Tuning a Link Between Language and Cognition: Evidence from 6- to 7- Month-Old Infants' Object Categorization
Published on: April 19, 2017
The Invisible Hand: Toddlers Connect Probabilistic Events With Agentive Causes
Yang Wu1, Paul Muentener2, Laura E Schulz1
1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Insights
Toddlers infer hidden causes for predictable events but not random ones. By 20 months, children connect probabilistic outcomes to unseen agents, indicating early causal reasoning development.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Development
- Developmental Psychology
- Causal Inference
Background:
- Children infer unobserved causes for spontaneous events.
- Research question: Do children infer unobserved causes for probabilistic events?
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate toddlers' causal reasoning with probabilistic events.
- Determine if toddlers attribute probabilistic outcomes to unobserved agents.
Main Methods:
- Toddlers (20.1 months) observed arbitrary causal relationships.
- Causal relationships were altered deterministically or probabilistically.
- Novel candidate causes (agent vs. non-agent) were introduced.
Main Results:
- Toddlers showed similar looking times for deterministic and probabilistic changes in causal relationships.
- Toddlers looked longer at novel agents in deterministic conditions compared to probabilistic ones.
- Looking times for novel non-agents did not differ between conditions.
Conclusions:
- By 20 months, toddlers differentiate between deterministic and probabilistic causal events.
- Toddlers connect probabilistic events with the presence of unobserved agents.
- Suggests early development of sophisticated causal inference abilities in young children.
Abstract:
Children posit unobserved causes when events appear to occur spontaneously (e.g., Gelman & Gottfried, 1996). What about when events appear to occur probabilistically? Here toddlers (M = 20.1 months) saw arbitrary causal relationships (Cause A generated Effect A; Cause B generated Effect B) in a fixed, alternating order. The relationships were then changed in one of two ways. In the Deterministic condition, the event order changed (Event B preceded Event A); in the Probabilistic condition, the causal relationships changed (Cause A generated Effect B; Cause B generated Effect A). As intended, toddlers looked equally long at both changes (Experiment 1). We then introduced a previously unseen candidate cause. Toddlers looked longer at the appearance of a hand (Experiment 2) and novel agent (Experiment 3) in the Deterministic than the Probabilistic conditions, but looked equally long at novel non-agents (Experiment 4), suggesting that by 2 years of age, toddlers connect probabilistic events with unobserved agents.
Related Concept Videos
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
Cause and Effect
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes
Correlation and Causation
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

