Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

317
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
317
In- and Out-Groups01:31

In- and Out-Groups

44.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
44.1K
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

15.1K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
15.1K
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

39.4K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
39.4K
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

96.0K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
96.0K
Stereotype Content Model02:16

Stereotype Content Model

15.7K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
15.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A borderline personality disorder diagnosis may improve clinical psychology trainees' treatment beliefs.

The British journal of clinical psychology·2026
Same author

On the relationship between indirect measures of Black versus White racial attitudes and discriminatory outcomes: An adversarial collaboration using a sample of White Americans.

Journal of personality and social psychology·2026
Same author

Awareness and Calibration: The Role of Descriptive Norms and Social Desirability in Accurate IAT Score Predictions of Food Items vs. Social Groups.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2024
Same author

Enhancing body image satisfaction and well-being among early adolescents: Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of the mind. body. voice. program.

Eating behaviors·2024
Same author

Developing the Sense of Belonging Scale and Understanding Its Relationship to Loneliness, Need to Belong, and General Well-Being Outcomes.

Journal of personality assessment·2023
Same author

Self-Awareness and Stereotypes: Accurate Prediction of Implicit Gender Stereotyping.

Personality & social psychology bulletin·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Apr 1, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.4K

Measuring intergroup ideologies: positive and negative aspects of emphasizing versus looking beyond group

Adam Hahn1, Sarah Banchefsky2, Bernadette Park2

  • 1Social Cognition Center Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany Adam.Hahn@uni-koeln.de.

Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin
|October 11, 2015
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a fourfold model of intergroup ideologies, revealing that both colorblind and multicultural approaches can lead to negative outgroup views. The research developed scales to measure assimilationism and segregationism in ethnic and gender relations.

Keywords:
colorblindgender awaregender blindintergroup ideologymulticultural

More Related Videos

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Apr 1, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
06:42

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses

Published on: September 28, 2018

12.4K
Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Intergroup Relations

Background:

  • Existing research on intergroup relations primarily considers two ideologies: colorblindness (de-emphasizing differences) and multiculturalism (celebrating differences).
  • These broad ideologies may mask more specific forms that can result in negative outgroup evaluations, such as assimilationism and segregationism.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate a fourfold model of intergroup ideologies, encompassing assimilationism and segregationism alongside colorblindness and multiculturalism.
  • To develop reliable measurement scales for these four ideologies in both ethnic and gender contexts.
  • To examine the relationships between these ideologies and attitudes towards group distinctions, outgroup evaluations, and conflict resolution preferences.

Main Methods:

  • Development and validation of measurement scales for four intergroup ideologies: assimilationism, segregationism, colorblindness, and multiculturalism.
  • Empirical studies conducted across ethnic and gender domains (Studies 1-4).
  • Statistical analysis to confirm hypothesized four-factor models and assess relationships with relevant variables.

Main Results:

  • Reliable measurement scales for the four ideologies were successfully developed.
  • The hypothesized four-factor models demonstrated superior fit compared to models with fewer factors.
  • Ideologies were found to correlate significantly with the perceived importance of group distinctions, evaluations of subordinate groups, and preferences for intergroup conflict solutions.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed fourfold model provides a more nuanced understanding of intergroup ideological attitudes than previous two-dimensional models.
  • This framework can enhance theoretical clarity and measurement precision in the study of intergroup relations.
  • The findings highlight how specific ideological approaches (assimilationism, segregationism) can underpin negative intergroup perceptions.