Nudges and coercion: conceptual, empirical, and normative considerations

Area of Science:

• Bioethics
• Philosophy of Science
• Behavioral Economics

Background:

• Coercion is a central concept in bioethical discourse.
• Quigley's (2014) analysis highlights the misapplication of coercion in debates surrounding 'nudges'.
• Understanding the precise definition and implications of coercion is crucial for ethical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

• To provide a sympathetic response to Quigley's analysis of coercion and nudges.
• To raise critical issues for broader debates on nudges and coercion in bioethics.
• To explore the definition of coercion, the role of empirical research, and normative concerns.

Main Methods:

• Conceptual analysis of coercion in bioethical literature.
• Critical commentary on Quigley's (2014) argument regarding nudges and coercion.
• Exploration of the interplay between empirical data and normative considerations.

Main Results:

• Agrees with Quigley's critique of the misapplication of coercion in nudge debates.
• Identifies the need for precision in defining coercion and related concepts.
• Highlights the importance of empirical research in understanding nudges and coercion.

Conclusions:

• While conceptual precision and empirical data are valuable, the debate must prioritize pressing normative considerations.
• Further research is needed to refine the understanding of coercion in the context of behavioral interventions.
• Ethical frameworks must evolve to address the complexities of nudging and its potential for coercion.