Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion01:24

Testing a Claim about Population Proportion

4.1K
A complete procedure for testing a claim about a population proportion is provided here.
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
4.1K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.8K
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

5.7K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
5.7K
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD01:21

Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD

6.5K
A complete procedure of testing a hypothesis about a population mean when the population standard deviation is unknown is explained here.
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
6.5K
Test for Homogeneity01:23

Test for Homogeneity

2.5K
The goodness–of–fit test can be used to decide whether a population fits a given distribution, but it will not suffice to decide whether two populations follow the same unknown distribution. A different test, called the test for homogeneity, can be used to conclude whether two populations have the same distribution. To calculate the test statistic for a test for homogeneity, follow the same procedure as with the test of independence. The hypotheses for the test for homogeneity can...
2.5K
Random Sampling Method01:09

Random Sampling Method

15.7K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest. Among the various sampling methods used by...
15.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identification and validation of SPP1 as a prognostic biomarker in interstitial lung disease subtypes by single-cell sequencing.

Respiratory research·2026
Same author

The impact of fertilization on the health of paddy soil: pathways and prospects for fertility regulation based on microbial communities.

Crop health·2026
Same author

Corrigendum to "Factors influencing the efficacy of nebulized colistimethate sodium in the treatment of severe lung infection caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria" [International Journal of Infectious Diseases. 2026 Jun; 167:108588].

International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases·2026
Same author

Highly sensitive rapid and portable detection of Hg<sup>2+</sup> and CH<sub>3</sub>Hg<sup>+</sup> in environmental samples based on boron nitrogen co-doped silicon quantum dots and a smartphone.

Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy·2026
Same author

Detection of Ultralow-Frequency ctDNA Mutations Using a Dual Hairpin-Competition CRISPR/Cas14a System.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same author

Loss of calcium-dependent phospholipase A2 contributes to multi-omic changes in mouse denervated skeletal muscle.

Physiological reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 31, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.5K

A probabilistic method for testing and estimating selection differences between populations.

Yungang He1, Minxian Wang1, Xin Huang1

  • 1Chinese Academy of Sciences Key Laboratory of Computational Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences-Max Planck Society Partner Institute for Computational Biology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China;

Genome Research
|October 15, 2015
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a new probabilistic method to quantify genetic selection differences between human populations. The approach successfully identified distinct evolutionary adaptations in Han and Tibetan populations, highlighting its capability in evolutionary genetics research.

More Related Videos

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

8.2K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 31, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.5K
A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
12:18

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment

Published on: January 11, 2020

8.2K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.5K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary genetics
  • Human adaptation
  • Population genetics

Background:

  • Human populations exhibit genetic adaptations to diverse environmental pressures.
  • Understanding population-specific natural selection is key to identifying adaptive genetic variants.
  • Existing methods for detecting selection are limited, lacking probabilistic quantification of selection differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a probabilistic method for testing and quantifying selection differences between populations.
  • To provide a statistical framework for hypothesis testing of differing selection pressures.
  • To estimate selection coefficient differences and their confidence intervals.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a probabilistic model integrating genetic drift and selection.
  • Utilized logarithm odds ratios of allele frequencies to estimate selection coefficient differences.
  • Employed genome-wide variants for variance estimation and confidence interval determination.

Main Results:

  • The method accurately estimates selection coefficient differences, approximating a normal distribution.
  • Analysis of Han and Tibetan populations confirmed statistically significant selection differences in EPAS1 and EGLN1 genes.
  • Differences in selection coefficients for melanin formation variants were estimated between continental groups.

Conclusions:

  • The novel probabilistic approach effectively tests and quantifies natural selection differences across populations.
  • This method links genetic association testing with selection difference hypothesis testing.
  • Demonstrated capability in analyzing complex human population genetic adaptations.