Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Variation in Patient-reported Outcomes Across Hospitals Following Surgery
Jennifer F Waljee1, Amir Ghaferi, Jonathan F Finks
1*Department of Surgery, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy †Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative, Center for Health Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor ‡Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit §Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Center for Clinical Outcomes Development and Application, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Background:
Although there is growing interest in applying patient-reported outcomes (PROs) toward surgical quality, the extent to which PROs vary across hospitals following surgical procedures is unknown.
Objectives:
We examined variation in PROs, specifically health-related quality of life (HRQOL), across hospitals performing bariatric surgery.
Research Design:
A retrospective cohort study.
Subjects:
The Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative is a statewide consortium of 39 hospitals performing laparoscopic gastric bypass, gastric banding, or sleeve gastrectomy (n=11,420 patients between 2008 and 2012).
Measures:
We examined generic and disease-specific HRQOL measured by the Health and Activities Limitations Index (HALex) and Bariatric Quality of Life index (BQL) preoperatively and at 1 year. We measured the variation in postoperative HRQOL across hospitals, and the effect of risk and reliability adjustment on hospital ranking.
Results:
In this cohort, HRQOL varied by 56% (HALex) and 37% (BQL) across hospitals. Patient factors accounted for 58% (HALex) to 71% (BQL) of the variation in HRQOL across hospitals. After risk and reliability adjustment, HRQOL varied by 18% (by HALex) and 14.5% (by BQL) across hospitals, and the proportion of patients who experienced a large improvement in HRQOL by HALex ranged from 33% to 69% and 67% to 92% by BQL. After adjusting for patient factors and reliability, these differences diminished to 55%-64% (HALex) and 79%-84% (BQL).
Conclusions:
Patient factors explain a large proportion of hospital-level variation in PROs following bariatric surgery, underscoring the importance of risk adjustment. However, some variation in PROs across hospitals remains unexplained, suggesting PROs may represent a viable indicator of hospital performance.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
00:59Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in...
01:28Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
01:28Hospitals-I
01:11Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
01:14SBAR II: Application of SBAR
SBAR Report from a Nurse to a Health Care Provider
S: "Hello, Dr. Smith. This is Jane, RN, from the Med Surg unit. I am calling to tell you about Ms. White in Room 210, who is experiencing increased pain and redness at her incision site. Her recent...