Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 31, 2026

X-ray Dose Reduction through Adaptive Exposure in Fluoroscopic Imaging
Published on: September 11, 2011
Understanding and Confronting Our Mistakes: The Epidemiology of Error in Radiology and Strategies for Error Reduction
Michael A Bruno1, Eric A Walker1, Hani H Abujudeh1
1From the Department of Radiology, H-066, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Dr, Hershey, PA 17033 (M.A.B., E.A.W.); Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Uniformed University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md (E.A.W.); and Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (H.H.A.).
Abstract:
Arriving at a medical diagnosis is a highly complex process that is extremely error prone. Missed or delayed diagnoses often lead to patient harm and missed opportunities for treatment. Since medical imaging is a major contributor to the overall diagnostic process, it is also a major potential source of diagnostic error. Although some diagnoses may be missed because of the technical or physical limitations of the imaging modality, including image resolution, intrinsic or extrinsic contrast, and signal-to-noise ratio, most missed radiologic diagnoses are attributable to image interpretation errors by radiologists. Radiologic interpretation cannot be mechanized or automated; it is a human enterprise based on complex psychophysiologic and cognitive processes and is itself subject to a wide variety of error types, including perceptual errors (those in which an important abnormality is simply not seen on the images) and cognitive errors (those in which the abnormality is visually detected but the meaning or importance of the finding is not correctly understood or appreciated). The overall prevalence of radiologists' errors in practice does not appear to have changed since it was first estimated in the 1960s. The authors review the epidemiology of errors in diagnostic radiology, including a recently proposed taxonomy of radiologists' errors, as well as research findings, in an attempt to elucidate possible underlying causes of these errors. The authors also propose strategies for error reduction in radiology. On the basis of current understanding, specific suggestions are offered as to how radiologists can improve their performance in practice.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

